Skip to Content

Sorting Out Life

Rubber chip promises a cheap way to segregate cells.
January 1, 2000

To understand disease and develop new drugs, researchers often must begin by sorting the jumble of cell types in a living organism-tumor cells from normal cells, for instance. In some cases, a refrigerator-sized “fluorescence-activated cell sorter,” or FACS, can do the job. These machines, however, are expensive ($250,000), tricky to operate and prone to contamination. Now a team at Caltech, led by applied physicist Stephen Quake, has built a “microFACS,” reducing the complicated system of pumps, tubes and nozzles to micrometers-wide channels in a stamp-sized rubber chip.

George Whitesides, a Harvard University chemist who developed some of the technology used by the Caltech team says, “Quake brings the perspective of a physicist to this problem in bioanalysis, with results that are, to me, spectacular.” Bay Area-based Mycometrix aims to make prototype microFACS systems available to potential customers by year’s end; the startup was formed in 1999 to commercialize technologies from Quake’s lab. Vice president of business development Todd Krueger estimates that the reader will sell for $40,000, the disposable chips for less than $20 apiece. By making cell sorting cheaper and simpler, he says, the system should open up a host of new applications for the technique outside the lab, including doctor’s-office diagnosis and food or water screening.

The microFACS uses laser light and electricity to sort a cell mixture. Three 2-millimeter-wide wells on the chip are connected by a T-shaped network of channels. A researcher first tags the cells with fluorescent markers, then loads them into the bottom well and drives them toward the channel junction with an electric current. The channels narrow to just a few micrometers near the junction, forcing the cells to proceed in single file. A laser aimed at the junction hits the different markers and causes each cell type to fluoresce in a particular color-say, red for tumor and blue for normal. A detector prompts a computer to adjust the current to drive each cell to the left or the right, into a waste well or a collection well.

One reason the microFACS is so cheap is that the chips are made by soft lithography, an experimental process developed by Whitesides. It’s potentially far less expensive than micromachining; instead of carving individual chips, researchers cast them in a reusable silicon mold.

Whitesides calls Quake’s cell sorter “an elegant piece of design,” and points out that it could be coupled to other ultrasmall analytical systems, such as single-cell DNA sequencers. Indeed, one of Quake’s future aims is to build the sorter and all the other scaled-down devices needed for a particular experiment linked together on one chip, a goal that many others in the field are hotly pursuing.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Google DeepMind’s new generative model makes Super Mario–like games from scratch

Genie learns how to control games by watching hours and hours of video. It could help train next-gen robots too.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.