The White House has formed a working group to help set up the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate (ARPA-C), which Biden pledged to create during the campaign. Its mission will be to accelerate progress in tough technical areas, likely including technologies that can capture, remove, and store carbon dioxide as well as heating and cooling products that don’t rely on highly potent greenhouse gases.
In addition, the Department of Energy plans to provide $100 million in funding for low-carbon energy projects through the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), a group funded in the first Obama administration to support clean energy technologies that aren’t far enough along to form businesses or attract traditional venture capital.
The move could help revitalize a favorite target of the Trump administration, which repeatedly tried to eliminate ARPA-E’s budget during the last four years. Congress, however, consistently maintained or even slightly raised its funding.
More federal money for research and development promises to drive down the cost of clean technologies, which makes it cheaper and more politically feasible to combat rising climate risks in the US and beyond.
But some energy observers are confused about why the administration wants to expend political capital trying to set up and fund a new research agency rather than focusing on boosting capital for existing programs. It took years for Congress to appropriate money for ARPA-E, which was authorized under George W. Bush but wasn’t funded until Obama pushed through the Recovery Act in 2009. The precise boundaries between the two ARPAs aren’t entirely clear either.
ARPA-E is primarily focused on “transformational low-carbon energy technologies,” while ARPA-C will likely take on a larger suite of climate-related tools, at least judging from Biden’s energy plan announced during the campaign.
Its expected focus on carbon capture, removal, and storage promises to be controversial. These technologies include systems that prevent greenhouse-gas emissions from leaving power plants and factories; “direct air capture” tools that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere; and even farming techniques that suck up and store more carbon in soil. (ARPA-E has made some investments in such areas already, too.)
Many fear that these technologies could help extend the life of the fossil-fuel industry. But they may also provide ways of preventing or counteracting emissions from sectors where there aren’t affordable and scalable clean options, like steel, cement, aviation, and agriculture. What’s more, the technologies could be critical in reducing levels of carbon dioxide already in the air.
The Biden administration said it wants to boost funding in other areas as well, including cheaper energy storage; lower-cost clean vehicles and transit; sustainable fuels for aircraft and ships; carbon-neutral building materials; and cheap, clean forms of hydrogen, which can be used as a fuel and is a crucial ingredient in certain industrial processes.
Climate change and energy
Think that your plastic is being recycled? Think again.
Plastic is cheap to make and shockingly profitable. It’s everywhere. And we’re all paying the price.
Decarbonizing your data strategy
Companies need to invest in energy-efficient infrastructure and optimize data practices, says Ian Clatworthy, director of data platform product marketing at Hitachi Vantara.
The University of California has all but dropped carbon offsets—and thinks you should, too
It uncovered systemic problems with offset markets and recommended that the public university system focus on cutting its direct emissions instead.
The power of green computing
Sustainable computing practices have the power to both infuse operational efficiencies and greatly reduce energy consumption, says Jen Huffstetler, chief product sustainability officer at Intel.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.