Covid-19 was the second pandemic of the decade for Liberia, which was devastated by Ebola just five years ago. A US-trained public health officer who served in both emergencies explains how some institutional knowledge was carried over, as well as how the virus entered the country despite considerable precautions.
The moment we heard that there was this new disease in China, we knew there was no chance that we wouldn’t get the disease in Liberia. The question was just: When is it coming? So we had to prepare.
82Covid deaths as of August 19, 2020. Source: WHO Dashboard
In January, Liberia became one of the first countries in the world to start screening for covid-19 at airports, based on our experience from Ebola and our understanding that our health system would not be as strong as anticipated. Those coming from a highly infected country at that time (anywhere with over 200 recorded cases) would have to be quarantined in our Precautionary Observation Center for 14 days upon arrival in the country. These were in hotels, and we monitored the travelers two to three times a day.
Our initial strategy was to prevent covid from coming into Liberia. We knew that it would have to come through the airport. So we thought, if we can proactively get somebody who comes in from a high-risk area and quickly isolate them, and if they come down with the virus, we can quickly get their sample and get it tested. And if it were positive, you would not have to go through a major round of contact tracing, since this person was being isolated.
I have served in public health both during the Liberian Civil War and later during Hurricane Katrina in the US. I was the county health officer in Anson County, North Carolina. I learned a lot about disaster preparedness when I went to help out in Louisiana.
During the Ebola crisis [of 2014-2015] in Liberia, I was the deputy incident manager, in charge of medical response and planning. Once covid-19 arrived, we started immediately to put the lessons we’d learned from Ebola into practice, because people were still aware of them: basic preventive measures like handwashing and basic social distancing. But when people begin to realize that covid-19 is not as severe as Ebola was, doubts began to come in. Then the hoaxes began.
The biggest thing we are fighting is the idea that the coronavirus is not real, that the government and inter- national organizations are doing this to make money for themselves.
This story is one in a series of interviews with people on the front lines of the coronavirus response in countries around the world. Check here for more.
The biggest thing we are fighting is the idea that the coronavirus is not real, that the government and international organizations are doing this to make money for themselves. Another is the fact that even those who have been tested positive, [if they] don’t show any major signs, sometimes don’t believe that they have it. So if you are at the treatment unit and you communicate with your relatives and family members that “Oh, there is nothing happening to me,” people don’t think it’s serious. The difference between covid and Ebola is that with Ebola I could see with my own eyes, even before the test result came, that a person had Ebola, because an infected person is usually not able to carry their own body weight. And when we did active case searches, it was very, very easy to quickly identify those who may have Ebola. For covid, there are people who are basically completely asymptomatic. We have begun to educate them that “Look, it’s not just you being treated. What we are doing is basically to isolate you from your relatives so that you can’t get them infected.”
When covid started, we had only one ventilator in the country, but now we have three, thanks to donations. But we have been lucky thus far that we have not made use of our ventilators. What this means, of course, is that the cases in our country so far have not been too severe. But that can change.
This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
What’s next for AI regulation in 2024?
The coming year is going to see the first sweeping AI laws enter into force, with global efforts to hold tech companies accountable.
Three technology trends shaping 2024’s elections
The biggest story of this year will be elections in the US and all around the globe
Four lessons from 2023 that tell us where AI regulation is going
What we should expect in the coming 12 months in AI policy
The FTC’s unprecedented move against data brokers, explained
It could signal more aggressive action from policy makers to curb the corrosive effects that data brokers have on personal privacy.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.