Skip to Content
Blockchain

Facebook’s digital currency project just got a lot less audacious

April 16, 2020
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call | AP Images

Remember Libra, Facebook’s plan to create a global digital currency? Unveiled last June, it was immediately met with resistance from policymakers and central bankers around the world. So the team went back to the drawing board, and today it reemerged with a new vision—one that is a lot less audacious than the original. 

Here are the most substantial edits:

A whole new plan for the currency. The original vision was for Libra to be a stablecoin backed by a reserve of cash and low-risk government securities denominated in a mixture of selected fiat currencies: US dollars, euros, British pounds, Japanese yen, and Singapore dollars. The new Libra is … not that.

A key piece of feedback from regulators was “the potential for a multi-currency Libra coin to interfere with monetary sovereignty,” according to the updated Libra white paper. So there’s a new strategy: The Libra Association, the nonprofit that Facebook has stood up to manage the currency, will issue multiple stablecoins denominated in single currencies. There will still be a Libra coin, but it will be a “digital composite of some of the single-currency stablecoins available on the Libra network.”

A welcome mat for central banks. The new approach will create a “clear path for seamlessly integrating central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as they become available,” according to the new white paper. It adds that if a central bank were to develop a digital representation of one of the currencies already on the network, the Libra Association could simply replace the single-currency stablecoin with the CBDC.

It’s even less of a “cryptocurrency” now. Few purists have ever seen Libra as a true cryptocurrency, despite the fact that it will use distributed ledger technology inspired by the kind that runs Bitcoin and other popular cryptocurrency networks. A signature characteristic of Bitcoin and its brethren is that they are “permissionless,” meaning that anyone with the right hardware can run the network’s shared software and contribute to the ongoing validation of new transactions. The validators in Libra’s network, on the other hand, will need to be vetted and given permission by the Libra Association.

In the original plan, this was only supposed to be the starting point. Libra’s creators pledged in their initial white paper to eventually transition the network to a permissionless structure. Now the association appears to have decided this approach is not going to fly with regulators. So it’s replacing the original plan with a new one aimed at creating a “market-driven open and competitive network,” Facebook’s blockchain chief, David Marcus, said on Twitter

Neither Marcus nor the new white paper spelled out what exactly that will mean. But it’s clear that in important ways Libra will not resemble what we usually call a “cryptocurrency.”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook?

Robot vacuum companies say your images are safe, but a sprawling global supply chain for data from our devices creates risk.

A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate

Make Sunsets is already attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to provoke widespread criticism.

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2023

Every year, we pick the 10 technologies that matter the most right now. We look for advances that will have a big impact on our lives and break down why they matter.

These exclusive satellite images show that Saudi Arabia’s sci-fi megacity is well underway

Weirdly, any recent work on The Line doesn’t show up on Google Maps. But we got the images anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.