Skip to Content

Trump’s decision to freeze WHO funding has been condemned

Criticism of the move was as sharp as it was swift.
April 15, 2020
President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus in the Rose Garden of the White House, Tuesday, April 14,
President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus in the Rose Garden of the White House, Tuesday, April 14,AP

The news: President Trump’s decision to freeze US funding for the World Health Organization has been met with condemnation by political and scientific leaders around the world. Yesterday Trump announced that US funding to the WHO would be suspended for 60 to 90 days pending a review to assess the organization’s “role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.” The US is the single biggest contributor to the WHO, paying it about $500 million last year, of an overall budget of around $6 billion.

The response: Criticism of the move was as sharp as it was swift. These were just some of the comments:

  • Antonio Guterres, head of the United Nations, the WHO’s parent organization, said it was “not the time to reduce the resources for the operations of the World Health Organization or any other humanitarian organization in the fight against the virus.”
  • EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said: “There is no reason justifying this move at a moment when their efforts are needed more than ever to help contain & mitigate the coronavirus pandemic.”
  • Richard Horton, the editor in chief of the Lancet medical journal, tweeted that Trump’s decision was “a crime against humanity.”
  • Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, said: “It’s not in the middle of a pandemic that you do this type of thing.”
  • Bill Gates, who is the biggest private funder of the WHO, tweeted: “Halting funding for the World Health Organization during a world health crisis is as dangerous as it sounds.”
  • Lawrence Gostin, the director of the WHO center on public health and human rights, tweeted that the move would backfire because other countries would step into the vacuum with increased funding. “In global health and amidst a pandemic, America will lose its voice,” said Gostin.

Reality check: The move can be interpreted as an attempt to shift blame for the pandemic, which has hit the US harder than any other country. But the WHO warned the US of the risk of human-to-human transmission of covid-19 as far back as January 10.

Deep Dive


Three things to know about the White House’s executive order on AI

Experts say its emphasis on content labeling, watermarking, and transparency represents important steps forward.

A high school’s deepfake porn scandal is pushing US lawmakers into action

Legislators are responding quickly after teens used AI to create nonconsensual sexually explicit images.

Meta is giving researchers more access to Facebook and Instagram data

There’s still so much we don’t know about social media’s impact. But Meta president of global affairs Nick Clegg tells MIT Technology Review that he hopes new tools the company just released will start to change that.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.