German publication Netzpolitik has posted an excerpt from TikTok’s new moderation guidelines. The document shows that moderators don’t take down political and protest content, but are still told to prevent these videos from becoming popular.
The background: China-owned TikTok is a wildly popular video app, and also the target of a US national security investigation. Politicians fear that the app could become a source of foreign-controlled disinformation and have expressed concern over a Guardian report that claimed the company censors political videos Beijing doesn’t like. TikTok's parent company insisted that the guidelines from the Guardian report were outdated and that the policies had changed. That may be the case, but the new rules accessed by Netzpolitik aren’t much better.
The news: According to a whistleblower who spoke with Netzpolitik, controversial content on the app is divided into the categories of “deleted,” “visible to self” (meaning other users can’t see it), “not recommended,” and “not for feed.” Videos in these last two categories won’t be curated by the main TikTok discovery engine, and “not for feed” also makes a video harder to find in search.
According to the guidelines, most political content during election periods should be marked “not recommended.” Political content includes everything from partisan speeches to party banners. Police content—including filming inside a police station or jail—is marked “not for feed.”
The document also shows some changes that TikTok has made. Once, content about riots and protests—including reference to Tibet, Taiwan, Northern Ireland, and Tiananmen Square—would be marked “not recommended.” That category has now been replaced by a category covering content that might result in “real-world harm,” according to the guidelines. Moderators are told to mark this “not for feed.”
What does TikTok say? In response to Netzpolitik, TikTok claims that it does not moderate content because of political sensitivities and that its moderation decisions are not influenced by any foreign governments. TikTok has also said that it does not remove content related to political demonstrations—which, of course, doesn’t address the question of whether it keeps these videos from finding an audience.
What’s next for AI regulation in 2024?
The coming year is going to see the first sweeping AI laws enter into force, with global efforts to hold tech companies accountable.
Three technology trends shaping 2024’s elections
The biggest story of this year will be elections in the US and all around the globe
Four lessons from 2023 that tell us where AI regulation is going
What we should expect in the coming 12 months in AI policy
The FTC’s unprecedented move against data brokers, explained
It could signal more aggressive action from policy makers to curb the corrosive effects that data brokers have on personal privacy.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.