Skip to Content
Climate change and energy

If we spend $1.7 trillion on climate adaptation we could make four times that much back

September 10, 2019
A young boy wheels his family's daily allowance of water during Somalia's drought earlier this decade.
A young boy wheels his family's daily allowance of water during Somalia's drought earlier this decade.Courtesy: Oxfam East Africa

Investing $1.7 trillion over the next decade to prepare for climate change will produce more than $7 trillion in economic returns, according to a new report. It will also save many lives.

The background: Advocates for climate action have argued in the past that bolstering our defenses against global warming would ease pressure on governments and businesses to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

But the analysis from the Global Commission on Adaptation, a nongovernmental organization led by former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, stresses that it's now too late not to do both.

Where do we start? The report highlights five areas that could provide more than $7 trillion in economic returns between 2020 and 2030, including:

 — Rebuilding shorelines, roads, sewers, power systems and other infrastructure in ways that will hold up to rising temperatures, sea levels and other climate risks ($4 trillion in economic benefits).

— Revitalizing natural watersheds and upgrading infrastructure to reduce flood risks and ensure water supplies ($1.4 trillion).

— Restoring mangrove forests that can protect coastal communities during storms ($1 trillion).

— Improving practices for growing crops in arid regions ($700 million).

— Building early warning systems that can help cities and citizens prepare in the face of coming storms and other events ($100 million).

So... how does spending money make money? First, the economic benefits include the losses that don’t occur when cities are better equipped to withstand extreme weather events. But there would also be positive benefits such as increased economic productivity and technological innovation, as governments and businesses make the investments to build better, modern infrastructure and tools.

Why do economic returns matter?: Climate change could kill or harm millions of people around the world in the coming years, which should be all the incentive we need to cut emissions and harden our defenses. But our meager collective response to date shows it's not.

The finding here that climate adaption could dramatically cut future costs and provide economic payoffs, may help to make the deep investments needed today at least a little more palatable – though certainly the general point has been made before.

Deep Dive

Climate change and energy

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Harvard has halted its long-planned atmospheric geoengineering experiment

The decision follows years of controversy and the departure of one of the program’s key researchers.

Why hydrogen is losing the race to power cleaner cars

Batteries are dominating zero-emissions vehicles, and the fuel has better uses elsewhere.

Decarbonizing production of energy is a quick win 

Clean technologies, including carbon management platforms, enable the global energy industry to play a crucial role in the transition to net zero.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.