Our bioengineered future
Susan Hockfield learned very early in her presidency at MIT that biology would be, as she puts it, the “technology for the next technology revolution.” In her first days on campus she sat down with the dean of the School of Engineering, who told her that one-third of the school’s faculty was using biology in their work—and not just the bioengineers.
That, Hockfield says, got her thinking.
She felt her role was to position the Institute for the future: “What do we have to be ready for? What can we use our campus to accelerate and invent?” Since she couldn’t predict the future, Hockfield decided her goal should be to hasten and make more visible the convergence already taking place between biology and engineering. That convergence, she says, promises dramatic, life-changing technological breakthroughs in the 21st century, just as the convergence of engineering and physics in the last century launched the electronics and computer industries.
Recent books from the MIT community
A Contagious Cause: The American Hunt for Cancer Viruses and the Rise of Molecular Medicine
By Robin Scheffler, Leo Marx Career Development Professor in the History and Culture of Science and Technology at the MIT Program in Science, Technology, and Society; Univ. of Chicago Press, 2019, $40
Strange Frequencies: The Extraordinary Story of the Technological Quest for the Supernatural
By Peter Bebergal, MIT technology licensing officer; TarcherPerigee, 2018, $28
Ugliness and Judgment: On Architecture in the Public Eye
By Timothy Hyde, associate professor of architecture; Princeton University Press, 2019, $35
Active Defense: China’s Military Strategy since 1949
By M. Taylor Fravel, professor of political science and member of the Security Studies Program; Princeton University Press, 2019, $35
Gyorgy Kepes: Undreaming the Bauhaus
By John R. Blakinger; MIT Press, 2019, $55
Alabamians in Blue: Freedmen, Unionists, and the Civil War in the Cotton State
By Christopher M. Rein ’92; Louisiana State University Press, 2019, $47.50
Hockfield, the first biologist and first woman to lead the Institute, recently published a book on this idea, called The Age of Living Machines—the same title and subject as a freshman seminar she’s taught for several years.
She wrote the book, she says, to introduce the general public to innovations like virus-made batteries, brain-powered prostheses, and new plant varieties designed using data-gathering and computational engineering tools. The book provides a framework for understanding such scientific advances. “You can cluster the ideas and have a sense of the cadence, the pace, the direction of our not-distant future,” she says.
In one chapter, she writes about Sangeeta Bhatia, SM ’93, PhD ’97, a professor and researcher at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, who has devised a urine test to detect tumors that are a twentieth the size of those found with current approaches—and therefore more curable. In another, she focuses on work by Johns Hopkins professor Peter Agre, whose (failed) efforts to purify the Rh protein out of blood led to advances in water desalination. Several of her examples are projects led by female scientists.
Hockfield says that MIT was already well positioned to be a leader in bioengineering, because of its strengths in both areas and because a number of researchers were already comfortable working across disciplines. And when the Koch opened under her watch, it encouraged more such collaboration by uniting biologists, engineers of every kind, and clinicians in one building. (Hockfield herself now has her office there.)
The fruits of convergence at the Koch, MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, the Ragon Institute, and the Department of Biological Engineering “made me understand how important it is, how game-changing it is,” she says. “I’ve become a very strong advocate of how shared ambition and shared purpose can expand the opportunities for people and expand the impact of our work.”
Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build
“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”
ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it
The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.
Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives
The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.
Learning to code isn’t enough
Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.