Full Fact, a charity that has been part of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking program for six months, says the company needs to be more transparent and expand the program to its other platforms, like Instagram.
Background: It’s the first public report from a Facebook fact-checker, so it’s a useful insight into how that process is working behind the scenes. You can read it here.
How the process works: Facebook users flag posts they suspect are false. They’re then reviewed by Full Fact, which labels them as true or not. If false, the post won’t disappear but it will be shown to fewer people, by appearing lower down in news feeds. Facebook is paying for the initiative, but it’s run by independent nonprofits and charities.
Read between the lines: Although the document is written using diplomatic language, it’s clear that Full Fact has some major concerns. Specifically, it says it’s worried that Facebook is rapidly increasing the scale of the fact-checking scheme, to cover 42 languages worldwide, before it can adequately speed up the response or increase the volume of content handled. It says Facebook does not share enough data with fact-checkers for them to evaluate the content or impact of posts. It also says the rating system Facebook uses for the program needs to change (but doesn't specify how).
Recommendations: Full Fact makes 11 recommendations. They’re mostly technical feedback for Facebook, including a call for a “more context needed” rating, a rating for satire or pranks, and new tools that can flag repeatedly posted harmful content. It also says Facebook needs to “be explicit about plans for machine learning.” Finally, Full Fact says the government needs to review responsibilities for providing authoritative information.
A little good news: It concludes the program is worthwhile, and similar schemes should be expanded to other online platforms. It also says Facebook seems to be responsive to feedback.
Next steps: Over to Facebook. If it fails to make meaningful changes in response to the report, it seems likely we can rely on Full Fact to let us know.
Sign up here for our daily newsletter The Download to get your dose of the latest must-read news from the world of emerging tech.
The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it
Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.
How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language
For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.
Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?
An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.
Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death
Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.