Skip to Content
77 Mass Ave

Remembering John Mattill

On his watch, Technology Review transformed from an alumni publication into a national magazine
John Mattill
John MattillCourtesy photo

MIT Technology Review lost one of the architects of the magazine’s modern incarnation with the death of former editor in chief John I. Mattill, 97, on March 10, 2019.

Mattill spent virtually his entire career at the Institute. In 1952 he established MIT’s Office of Publications, which came to be celebrated internationally as a greenhouse of design. From 1966 to 1988, he oversaw the transformation of Technology Review from an alumni publication into a national magazine that was hailed as a bona fide journalistic enterprise.

Though not a designer, Mattill championed the marriage of editorial content and visual presentation, and he hired MIT’s first graphic designers: Muriel Cooper, Jacqueline Casey, Ralph Coburn, and Dietmar Winkler. The four became leaders in the then-new field of graphic design, absorbing the Bauhaus sensibility to create the widely admired “MIT Look.”

But Mattill’s greatest passion was Technology Review. He’d fallen in love with MIT—awed by all that it did for the world—and saw the magazine as a way to shine a spotlight on its many newsworthy pursuits.

Under Mattill, Technology Review evolved in three ways. First, technology coverage embraced not just the nuts and bolts but also the costs, benefits, and impacts (on individuals, communities, countries, and the planet), regularly taking political constraints, business objectives, military policies, and more into account. That is, stories about technology had to cover both technology and its implications.

Second, such stories would not necessarily focus on MIT. Even a provincial reader who cared only about MIT needed to learn of other relevant players’ contributions in order to assess how MIT was doing.

And while Technology Review was founded in 1899 to serve MIT’s alumni, under Mattill it increasingly attracted other readers. When he hired me in 1979 as his managing editor, the magazine had about 100,000 subscribers, half of whom were graduates or members of the MIT community. But the other half had no known connection to MIT; when I became editor in chief in 1991, that group had grown to some two thirds of our readers.

Born on September 12, 1921, in Rochester, New York, Mattill grew up in Iowa City, Iowa (where he met his future wife, Anne Waterman), graduated from Carleton College, and served in the US Army Signal Corps during World War II. After earning an MA in technical writing from the University of Iowa, he joined MIT’s news service in 1948.

During his long career, Mattill’s editorial skills, rigorous standards, and professionalism inspired his staff. Hard-working and productive, he disliked being complimented, as he never felt he had worked hard enough, or secured good enough stories, or dug deep enough. He believed praise was irrelevant. You deliver a high-quality product simply because you are supposed to—it’s your job.

Mattill was especially adept at rescuing the writings of expert authors, who sometimes wrote in tongues. And he could turn the most tedious, jargon-filled, seemingly hopeless manuscript into a thing of beauty. But whatever their skill level, Mattill had great respect for writers and treated them with diplomacy and kindness because he appreciated their courage. “The ability to face the blank page,” he liked to say, “is what separates the men from the boys.”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language

For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.

ChatGPT is about to revolutionize the economy. We need to decide what that looks like.

New large language models will transform many jobs. Whether they will lead to widespread prosperity or not is up to us.

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.