Skip to Content

Car makers are testing a way for humans to team up with dangerous robots

If Veo Robotics is successful, human factory workers will eventually work with robots the way farmers work with horses.
September 12, 2018
Photo of Clara Vu speaking at EmTech 2018
Photo of Clara Vu speaking at EmTech 2018
Photo of Clara Vu speaking at EmTech 2018Jake Belcher

Car manufacturers have been using robots in factories for decades. But these huge industrial machines are too dumb and dangerous for humans to work anywhere close to. That’s a problem being addressed by Veo Robotics, a startup helping to create robot factory workers that can work safely alongside their human coworkers.

But while Veo might be a startup, its robots can’t simply move fast and break things—because the things they’d be breaking would be people, VP of engineering Clara Vu explained at MIT Technology Review’s EmTech conference today. That’s why it’s so impressive that several major manufacturing firms are already testing Veo’s technology and beginning to imagine scenarios in which humans and industrial workers can work safely alongside each other.

Manufacturers—particularly car makers—need robots because they are far better and more efficient than humans at welding or lifting and moving heavy parts. Humans, however, are far better than robots at tasks like fastening small parts together, which requires precision, fine manipulation, and sensitivity to feedback. So whereas welding has been almost completely automated, the final assembly line—the last phase before a car can roll off the factory floor—still looks mostly the way it did 100 years ago, said Vu, with “hundreds of people doing hundreds of tasks almost completely manually.”

In theory, if humans and their robotic counterparts could work side by side, things like final assembly could be achieved more efficiently. But at the moment the risk of human injury is too great, and safety standards require that robots be kept segregated—often in cages. Veo is using 3-D sensors, advanced computer vision, and software that builds representations of its immediate environment so it can spot and avoid people (see “This company tames killer robots”).

Vu said the company has recently partnered with three major manufacturers—an automaker, a manufacturer of consumer packaged goods, and a tier-one automotive supplier—on “early prototype trials” to test Veo’s systems. 

But it’s not just about making safer robots: the humans need some reassurance too. “For a line worker to be able to approach that robot, it not only has to be safe; it has to feel safe,” she said. So Veo is working on human-robot collaboration models that are similar to the way a farmer can work with a horse, she explained: “That horse can hurt you, but you know it won’t, because you know how it thinks and you know how to interact with it.”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Workers disinfect the street outside Shijiazhuang Railway Station
Workers disinfect the street outside Shijiazhuang Railway Station

Why China is still obsessed with disinfecting everything

Most public health bodies dealing with covid have long since moved on from the idea of surface transmission. China’s didn’t—and that helps it control the narrative about the disease’s origins and danger.

individual aging affects covid outcomes concept
individual aging affects covid outcomes concept

Anti-aging drugs are being tested as a way to treat covid

Drugs that rejuvenate our immune systems and make us biologically younger could help protect us from the disease’s worst effects.

Europe's AI Act concept
Europe's AI Act concept

A quick guide to the most important AI law you’ve never heard of

The European Union is planning new legislation aimed at curbing the worst harms associated with artificial intelligence.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.