Skip to Content
Computing

Microsoft’s $7.5 billion purchase of GitHub will provoke a developer backlash

The world’s leading repository of open-source code is set to become part of a software giant that built its fortune on proprietary software. Some developers are already worried. 

The news: Bloomberg  first reported news of the transaction, and Microsoft has now confirmed it’s buying GitHub, the leading online service that lets developers store and collaborate on code development. GitHub began by focusing on open-source software but has since branched into services that let large companies like Facebook use it for more sensitive, proprietary projects. 

The prize: GitHub is used by over 28 million developers and holds over 85 million “repositories” of code. It’s popular because of its Git software-management system, which makes tracking different versions of software dead easy. It also benefits from a powerful network effect—as more developers have joined it, GitHub has become even more attractive to other coders.

Why this matters: Microsoft says it’s been the most active organization on GitHub, and that it wants it to operate independently. But why, then, is it paying so much for the business, which was last valued at $2.5 billion in 2015?

The most plausible answer is that the company will significantly influence the way the platform operates to its advantage, and get an invaluable overview of the projects being worked on across it. That will propbably spook big software companies like Google and Facebook, which won’t like the idea of developing their code on a platform controlled by a rival. Some coders are already expressing misgivings about the deal as well. Unless Microsoft treads carefully, some could flee to rival repositories like BitBucket or GitLab, which has seen a big spike in traffic since news of the deal broke.

Deep Dive

Computing

How a simple circuit could offer an alternative to energy-intensive GPUs

The creative new approach could lead to more energy-efficient machine-learning hardware.

How gamification took over the world

Gamification was always just behaviorism dressed up in pixels and point systems. Why did we fall for it?

Digital twins are helping scientists run the world’s most complex experiments

Engineers use the high-fidelity models to monitor operations, plan fixes, and troubleshoot problems.

Quartz, cobalt, and the waste we leave behind

Three books reveal just how tragic a toll the materials we rely on take for humans and the environment.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.