Skip to Content
Silicon Valley

What Zuckerberg said, and what he didn’t

Facebook’s CEO finally broke his media silence with a string of interviews about his firm’s data scandal last night. But what did he really have to say?

Backstory: Facebook is embroiled in a huge scandal because of the way its users’ data was shared with Cambridge Analytica, a firm that provided data to the Trump election campaign in 2016.

Mea culpa? Kinda: In a Facebook post yesterday, Zuck said the debacle was “a breach of trust” between Facebook and its users, but he also passed blame to Cambridge Analytica. He announced a set of audits and investigations to discover other data offences, and he plans to introduce policies to stop similar problems in the future.

What Zuck said: The CEO then went on a media offensive, giving interviews to CNN, the New York TimesWired, and Recode. Here’s what he had to say.

On social media regulation: “I’m not sure we shouldn’t be regulated,” Zuckerberg said to CNN. “There are things like ad transparency regulation that I would love to see.”

On Facebook’s business model: “I don’t think the ad model is going to go away,” he told the New York  Times, “because I think fundamentally, it’s important to have a service like this that everyone in the world can use, and the only way to do that is to have it be very cheap or free.”

On testifying to Congress: “If it is ever the case that I am the most informed person at Facebook in the best position to testify, I will happily do that,” he told Wired. (Out of interest: who, exactly, is better qualified than he?)

On a user exodus: “I don’t think we’ve seen a meaningful number of people act on [#DeleteFacebook], but, you know, it’s not good,” he told the Times.

On resources to fix things: “We’ll have more than 20,000 people working on security and community operations by the end of the year,” he told the Times. And to Recode he said that the fixes will cost “many millions of dollars.”

What Zuck didn't say: An overwhelming message from the interviews was an insistence that Facebook is doing the best it can to keep up in a fast-changing world. That’s debatable, and he didn’t really explain how the firm could try to take a more proactive approach. He also didn’t fully articulate why we didn’t find out sooner about this mess, which he first heard of in 2015.

Just the start: Zuck shouldn’t expect his media appearances to draw any kind of line under events. He’ll still be pursued by governments, lawyers, and critics over the “breach of trust.” And the firm continues to hurt financially: its stock keeps sliding.

 

Keep Reading

Most Popular

This startup wants to copy you into an embryo for organ harvesting

With plans to create realistic synthetic embryos, grown in jars, Renewal Bio is on a journey to the horizon of science and ethics.

VR is as good as psychedelics at helping people reach transcendence

On key metrics, a VR experience elicited a response indistinguishable from subjects who took medium doses of LSD or magic mushrooms.

This nanoparticle could be the key to a universal covid vaccine

Ending the covid pandemic might well require a vaccine that protects against any new strains. Researchers may have found a strategy that will work.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.