Skip to Content
Uncategorized

The CRISPR Competitor That Wasn’t

August 3, 2017

At this point, CRISPR is essentially synonymous with the process of gene-editing. But many researchers are trying to find alternatives, and in May 2016 Chinese researchers published a study which suggested that an enzyme called NgAgo could be used to slice and dice DNA instead of the cas9 enzyme used by CRISPR. (For a run down on how the hell CRISPR works, check out our two-minute explainer.) At the time, the researchers even said that NgAgo might end up more versatile than its infamous competitor. But things haven’t played out well for the team from Hebei University of Science and Technology in Shijiazhuang, China. Nature reports that other laboratories have tried to replicate the NgAgo approach and failed, forcing the researchers to retract their original paper. CRISPR can rest easy.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

OpenAI teases an amazing new generative video model called Sora

The firm is sharing Sora with a small group of safety testers but the rest of us will have to wait to learn more.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Google DeepMind’s new generative model makes Super Mario–like games from scratch

Genie learns how to control games by watching hours and hours of video. It could help train next-gen robots too.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.