If the Trump administration gets its way, the government will soon have the authority to hack into an unmanned aircraft in U.S. airspace to determine if it is a security threat—and to take it down if necessary.
In a draft legislative proposal obtained by the New York Times, administration officials argue that new legislation is needed because drones were “unforeseen” when existing laws against unauthorized hacking and surveillance, and which protect civil aircraft, were passed. “Potential liability under such laws restricts innovation, evaluation, and operational use of technical countermeasures that can address the unique public safety and homeland security threats posed by UAS [unmanned aerial systems],” they write.
Small consumer and commercial drones are getting cheaper and more sophisticated (see “Now You Can Finally Use Your Drone to Make Money”), so it makes sense that the government is concerned about the safety risks they pose. That includes the danger of errant drones, like the one that crash-landed on the White House lawn in 2015, as well as the threat that they could be weaponized. In February, the Washington Post reported that Islamic State fighters are engaged in a “rapidly accelerating campaign of armed drone strikes” in northern Iraq. In 2011, a man from Massachusetts was accused of plotting to strike the Pentagon and the Capitol using small drones carrying bombs.
The proposed law is vague on what agency or officials would be doing the hacking, tracking, and removal of drones from the sky, and how they would do it. There are a number of anti-drone systems already commercially available. Those techniques “may be construed to be illegal” in the absence of new legislation, the proposal’s authors write. According to a leaked draft and summary of the proposal, it is under consideration as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, which Congress must pass every year to authorize the Defense Department’s budget.
It’s been clear for years that drones bring with them new regulatory challenges that might require new laws. Just last week, a federal court ruled that the FAA does not have the authority to make consumers register their drones with the government, a measure that even many in the drone industry see as important for maintaining safe skies. Besides safety concerns, drones also raise new privacy-related questions, and this is another area where the authors of the new proposal remained vague. The legislation would require the new policy to “respect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties,” they write, but they also state that no court would have jurisdiction to hear lawsuits brought as a result of enforcing the law.
Though there is clearly a lot that still needs ironing out, the Trump administration appears serious about rewriting the laws to address what it sees as a new threat from the sky. Now it will need Congress to play ball.
These weird virtual creatures evolve their bodies to solve problems
They show how intelligence and body plans are closely linked—and could unlock AI for robots.
Surgeons have successfully tested a pig’s kidney in a human patient
The test, in a brain-dead patient, was very short but represents a milestone in the long quest to use animal organs in human transplants.
Is everything in the world a little bit conscious?
The idea that consciousness is widespread is attractive to many for intellectual and, perhaps, also emotional
reasons. But can it be tested? Surprisingly, perhaps it can.
We reviewed three at-home covid tests. The results were mixed.
Over-the-counter coronavirus tests are finally available in the US. Some are more accurate and easier to use than others.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.