Getting robots to do what we want often requires giving them explicit commands for very specific tasks. But new research suggests that we could one day control them in much more intuitive ways.
A team from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and Boston University has developed a feedback system that lets people use their thoughts to correct robots instantly when the machines make mistakes. Using data from an electroencephalography (EEG) monitor that records brain activity, the system can detect—in the space of 10 to 30 milliseconds—if a person notices an error as a robot performs an object-sorting task.
“Imagine being able to instantaneously tell a robot to do a certain action, without needing to type a command, push a button, or even say a word,” says CSAIL director Daniela Rus, a senior author on a paper about the research being presented at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation in May. “A streamlined approach like that would improve our abilities to supervise factory robots, driverless cars, and other technologies we haven’t even invented yet.”
Past work in robotics controlled by EEG has required training humans to think in a prescribed way that computers can recognize. For example, an operator might have to look at one of two bright light displays, each of which corresponds to a different task for the robot to execute. But the training process and the act of modulating one’s thoughts can be taxing, particularly for people who supervise tasks in navigation or construction that require intense concentration.
Rus’s team wanted to make the experience more natural. To do that, they focused on brain signals called error-related potentials (ErrPs), which are generated whenever our brains notice a mistake. As the robot—in this case, a humanoid robot named Baxter from Rethink Robotics, the company led by former CSAIL director Rodney Brooks—indicates which choice it plans to make in a binary activity, the system uses ErrPs to determine whether the human agrees with the decision.
“As you watch the robot, all you have to do is mentally agree or disagree with what it is doing,” says Rus. “You don’t have to train yourself to think in a certain way—the machine adapts to you and not the other way around.”
DeepMind’s cofounder: Generative AI is just a phase. What’s next is interactive AI.
“This is a profound moment in the history of technology,” says Mustafa Suleyman.
What to know about this autumn’s covid vaccines
New variants will pose a challenge, but early signs suggest the shots will still boost antibody responses.
Human-plus-AI solutions mitigate security threats
With the right human oversight, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence can help keep business and customer data secure
Next slide, please: A brief history of the corporate presentation
From million-dollar slide shows to Steve Jobs’s introduction of the iPhone, a bit of show business never hurt plain old business.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.