Birds are the best-known example of creatures able to sense magnetic fields and to use them for orientation and navigation. Less well known are the magneto-sensing abilities of American cockroaches, which quickly become magnetized when placed in a magnetic field.
Just how these creatures use this ability is the subject of much speculation. But there is general agreement that a better understanding of biomagnetic sensing could help engineers design better sensors for other applications, such as microrobot navigation.
But before that can happen, engineers will need a far better understanding of how cockroaches sense magnetic fields and how they become magnetized themselves.
Enter Ling-Jun Kong at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a few pals who have measured the way American cockroaches become magnetized. In the process, they’ve made a remarkable discovery—it turns out that the magnetic properties of living cockroaches are strikingly different from those of dead cockroaches. And they think they know why.
The experiments are straightforward. Kong and co placed a series of living and dead cockroaches in a magnetic field of 1.5 kiloGauss; that’s about 100 times stronger than a fridge magnet. The team left the creatures in the field for 20 minutes and then measured how strongly they had become magnetized and how long it took for this magnetization to decay.
The results make for interesting reading. The team could easily measure the magnetic field associated with all the cockroaches, alive or dead, as soon as they came out of the external field. The field associated with living cockroaches then decayed in about 50 minutes. By contrast, it took almost 50 hours for the field to decay in dead cockroaches.
That raises an obvious question: why the difference? Kong and co have created a mathematical model of magnetization to come up with the answer. They assume that magnetization is the result of magnetic particles inside the cockroaches aligning themselves with the external magnetic field. When removed from the external field, the magnetization decays because Brownian motion causes the magnetic particles to become randomly aligned again.
But they also investigate how the time this takes varies according to the viscosity of the medium the particles are trapped in. They show that the decay time increases as the viscosity of this medium increases and becomes more glassy.
This suggests an answer to the conundrum. Cockroaches become magnetized because they contain magnetic particles that become aligned with an external magnetic field. These particles are trapped in a runny medium that has low viscosity in living cockroaches. But as soon as the creatures die, the medium begins to harden and its viscosity increases. That’s what causes the decay time to increase.
That’s interesting work that helps to answer some important questions about the way cockroaches interact with external magnetic fields. But it leaves plenty of mysteries.
First is the question of the nature of the magnetic particles—what are they? Biologists have found tiny particles of the magnetic mineral greigite (a type of iron sulphide) in ants, bees, and termites.
So it may be that cockroaches also contain particles of greigite. Indeed, Kong and co’s results are compatible with the presence of greigite particles with a radius of 50 nanometers or so but the results rule out the presence of related magnetic minerals such as magnetite.
Another question is where such particles might come from. Are they contaminants picked up by the cockroaches from their environment or are they biogenic, formed by a biological process inside the cockroaches themselves? Kong and co are unable to answer this.
However, they can throw some light on how cockroaches might use this kind of magnetization. They say that the decay time of 50 minutes in living cockroaches is too slow to be of any biological use. “Our data and model show that these magnetic particles cannot be responsible for magnetic sensing,” they say.
So if cockroaches do exploit magnetic sensing, they must use some other mechanism. The leading contender here is the radical pair mechanism in which a magnetic field influences the outcome of a chemical reaction.
Many biophysicists consider this the only mechanism that can realistically influence living creatures on a time scale that can be biologically useful. Perhaps cockroaches use this, too. “Our experiment provides support for other forms of magneto-reception, e.g. the radical-pair mechanism,” say Kong and co.
That’s interesting work that will be a stepping stone to better understanding biosensing of magnetic fields and of exploiting this ability in future generations of sensors.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1702.00538: In-Vivo Biomagnetic Characterisation of the American Cockroach
DeepMind’s cofounder: Generative AI is just a phase. What’s next is interactive AI.
“This is a profound moment in the history of technology,” says Mustafa Suleyman.
What to know about this autumn’s covid vaccines
New variants will pose a challenge, but early signs suggest the shots will still boost antibody responses.
Human-plus-AI solutions mitigate security threats
With the right human oversight, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence can help keep business and customer data secure
Next slide, please: A brief history of the corporate presentation
From million-dollar slide shows to Steve Jobs’s introduction of the iPhone, a bit of show business never hurt plain old business.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.