Skip to Content

A Genetically Modified Malaria Vaccine Has Passed an Important Hurdle

Researchers have tested a modified malaria parasite in humans that has been shown to be safe and to trigger an immune response.
January 4, 2017

It seems a primitive way to fight one of the world’s worst diseases, but 10 volunteers have been bitten by malaria-carrying mosquitoes in an effort to test out a new kind of genetically modified vaccine. So far, so good: no one got sick, and all 10 subjects developed antibodies, suggesting the new vaccine was doing its job.

Researchers led by Jim Kublin at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle knocked out three genes in the parasite Plasmodium falciparum, which causes the type of malaria most commonly found in Africa. Previous testing in mice showed that deleting just those genes was enough to prevent the parasite from progressing through its life cycle—infected mice developed antibodies but never got sick. They reported the results of the first trials in people today in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

It’s a promising step for a vaccine that is badly needed—in 2015, the World Health Organization estimated that 214 million people got malaria and 438,000 died from it.

Several malaria vaccines are in development, but they all come with big drawbacks. One, called RTS,S, uses a genetically modified protein from P. falciparum to condition the immune system against the parasites. It has undergone large human trials and it’s scheduled to be rolled out in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa in 2018. But it’s only effective in about a third of patients.

Another method in trials uses radiation to damage parasites’ DNA and weaken them. They are then injected. The vaccine, called PfSPZ, has been shown to provide lasting protection in more than half of people, but only if they went through four rounds of injections.

Irradiation damages DNA at random, whereas targeted gene deletion achieves a consistent result—that’s likely why the volunteers who were bitten all had the same reaction. That makes this most recent vaccine particularly attractive.

But it’s early days. For one thing, volunteers exposed to the parasites with deleted genes were never infected with full-strength bugs to see if their immune systems would fend them off. That crucial next step is due to occur sometime next year, according to Science. If all goes well, the vaccine could then move into large-scale trials.

Until then, a vaccine that helps half, or even a third, of people who get it isn’t ideal, but it would still save thousands of lives. And it would be a welcome addition to other, more prosaic tactics for fighting malaria, like distributing bed nets, that have made progress against the disease.

If that feels incremental or unsatisfying as a solution to one of the world’s greatest challenges, you could always just engineer the mosquitoes themselves out of existence.

(Read more: Science, “Are Altered Mosquitoes a Public Health Project, or a Business?,” “Bill Gates Doubles His Bet on Wiping Out Mosquitoes with Gene Editing”)

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Here’s how a Twitter engineer says it will break in the coming weeks

One insider says the company’s current staffing isn’t able to sustain the platform.

Technology that lets us “speak” to our dead relatives has arrived. Are we ready?

Digital clones of the people we love could forever change how we grieve.

How to befriend a crow

I watched a bunch of crows on TikTok and now I'm trying to connect with some local birds.

Starlink signals can be reverse-engineered to work like GPS—whether SpaceX likes it or not

Elon said no thanks to using his mega-constellation for navigation. Researchers went ahead anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.