Skip to Content

The NSA Spied on Cell Phones on Airplanes in Mid-Flight

Even at 30,000 feet, intelligence agencies can keep tabs on you.
December 8, 2016

The walls have ears—even at 30,000 feet.

An investigation by the Intercept and French newspaper Le Monde reveals that British and American spy agencies used satellite systems to keep track of cell phone use aboard passenger flights from as far back as 2005.

Many airlines now offer in-flight phone and data services. But airplanes have been fitted with on-board GSM systems that allowed them to provide mobile connections since the mid-2000s.

Even though passengers weren’t always strictly allowed to make phone calls on flights back then, people had increasingly begun to realize that using a phone during a flight wasn’t necessarily as dangerous as they’d been led to believe. So if they had signal and could stomach the cost, why not make a call?

The spooks knew this too, of course, and Britain’s intelligence agency, GCHQ, and the NSA paid close attention to airborne callers. One National Security Agency document cited by the media outlets explains that the agency had already recorded data from 100,000 people who used their phones during flights by February 2009.

The two organizations appear to have used ground stations to intercept signals being transmitted between airplanes and satellites. The Intercept notes that the “simple fact that the telephone was switched on was enough to give away its position.” But they could also monitor usage, enabling them to log details about phone calls, text messages, and data transmission.

These days, with cellular connections widespread on airliners, such monitoring is likely to be commonplace—and, indeed, NSA records show timestamps and dates of phone calls made in recent years. So next time you’re tempted to make a mile-high phone call, you might consider just watching a movie instead.

(Read more: The Intercept, “Ultraprivate Smartphones,” “Can Cell Phones on Planes Be Dangerous?”)

Keep Reading

Most Popular

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Sam Altman says helpful agents are poised to become AI’s killer function

Open AI’s CEO says we won’t need new hardware or lots more training data to get there.

An AI startup made a hyperrealistic deepfake of me that’s so good it’s scary

Synthesia's new technology is impressive but raises big questions about a world where we increasingly can’t tell what’s real.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.