Skip to Content

Wikileaks E-Mails Are an Election Influence to Really Worry About

Hacked e-mails published to Wikileaks were a “conscious effort by a nation-state” to interfere with the election, according to the NSA’s chief.
November 16, 2016

In the run-up to the election, the e-mail servers of the Democratic National Committee were hacked and their contents published by Wikileaks. Now, Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, has spoken out to leave us in no doubt: it was a deliberate attempt by a nation-state to interfere with the election. And that is something we should really worry about.

He didn’t name Russia specifically. But as Quartz points out, an earlier joint statement by several U.S. intelligence agencies already suggested that the country was linked to the hacks. It’s worth reproducing the comment of Rogers, delivered at a Wall Street Journal conference, in full:

“There shouldn’t be any doubt in anybody’s minds, this was not something that was done casually, this was not something that was done by chance, this was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily. This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect.”

NSA chief Michael S. Rogers.

Swept up in a maelstrom of Facebook’s fake news and widespread worries over Donald Trump, it’s easy to forget that the run-up to the election was heavily shaped by the drip-drip publication of several Democrats’ hacked e-mails. Compared to Facebook’s blundering, those e-mails may not constitute as easy a target for our scorn, but they are indicative of something far more nefarious: as Rogers points out, it was a deliberate plot to warp results by a foreign power.

Even if the release of the e-mails had a relatively minor impact on this election, it could be the beginning of a worrying trend. Security expert Bruce Schneier wrote in the Washington Post that “if foreign governments learn they can influence our elections with impunity” we could “[open] the door to future manipulations, both document thefts and dumps like this one that we see and more subtle manipulations that we don’t see.”

How the U.S. should respond, other than with much-improved encryption and security, is unclear. Joe Biden has said that the U.S. should retaliate with “a message … at the time of our choosing [with] the greatest impact.” President-elect Donald Trump hasn’t defined any specific plans for cyber policy, though he has declared a desire to “get very, very tough on ... cyber warfare.”

Until some solution is found, the U.S. political process isn’t even under American control.

(Read more: Wall Street Journal, Quartz, “What the DNC Hack Says about Cyber-Based Threats to Democracy,” “The Internet Is No Place for Elections”)

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Here’s how a Twitter engineer says it will break in the coming weeks

One insider says the company’s current staffing isn’t able to sustain the platform.

Technology that lets us “speak” to our dead relatives has arrived. Are we ready?

Digital clones of the people we love could forever change how we grieve.

How to befriend a crow

I watched a bunch of crows on TikTok and now I'm trying to connect with some local birds.

Starlink signals can be reverse-engineered to work like GPS—whether SpaceX likes it or not

Elon said no thanks to using his mega-constellation for navigation. Researchers went ahead anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.