Skip to Content

Italy’s Deadly Earthquake Highlights Its Huge Problem With Infrastructure

The country has plenty of experience with earthquakes, but somehow suffers more than other developed nations when the ground shakes.
August 24, 2016

Let’s get one thing out of the way: the magnitude 6.2 earthquake that struck north of Amatrice, Italy, in the small hours of Wednesday morning wasn’t very powerful. Much more powerful earthquakes have occurred several times in the last few years in places like Japan and South America, with less dramatic results.

That’s not to discount the tragedy of the quake, which has killed at least 120 people at the time of writing. If anything, it exacerbates it. Italy is a developed country; it has a long history of earthquakes and a nationwide seismic monitoring network. It shouldn’t be suffering so badly from quakes that it knows are coming (if not precisely when). And yet this is the fourth temblor to cause devastation in Italy in the last decade. One, a magnitude 6.3 quake that struck L’Aquila in 2009, flattened most of the town and killed 300 people. The country responded in part by blaming scientists.

The real culprit is poor commitment to building hardened infrastructure. A large portion of the country’s buildings date to the decades after World War II, when the population was booming, but construction codes didn’t yet account for seismic hazards. While laws were updated in the 1970s, many of them have been ignored, even for hospitals and schools. Recently constructed buildings often fail disproportionately when the ground starts shaking. A report in the Washington Post from nearby the epicenter of Wednesday’s quake typifies the pattern of damage:

Journalist Sabrina Fantauzzi was in Illica, a village 88 miles northeast of Rome, when the earthquake struck. "When I woke up during the night from the shock, I saw a big crack in the wall, I made it just in time to take the kids, taking the stairs and leave," she told ANSA. "The oldest houses, those of 1700, are damaged ... but those made in the ’70s are pulverized. The only buildings that held up were those built after the ’80s, according to earthquake-resistant criteria."

When an earthquake hits, reactions often focus on the randomness, the human tragedy, and the inability to prevent it. Sometimes high-tech measures are mentioned, and early detection networks have been shown to give people precious seconds to get to safety before seismic waves strike.

But improving building standards (and following them) is a much more potent recipe for saving lives. Italy is far from alone in having room to improve on this front, and many developing nations are far worse off. The country may be unique, though, in that it has the resources, know-how, and even the laws needed to build structures that minimize loss of life. Yet somehow each time disaster strikes, the story seems to be largely the same.

(Read more: Washington Post, New York TimesChristian Science Monitor, Science, “How International Monitors Spot Nukes and Other Rumblings,” “80 Seconds of Warning for Tokyo”)

Keep Reading

Most Popular

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Sam Altman says helpful agents are poised to become AI’s killer function

Open AI’s CEO says we won’t need new hardware or lots more training data to get there.

A brief, weird history of brainwashing

L. Ron Hubbard, Operation Midnight Climax, and stochastic terrorism—the race for mind control changed America forever.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.