Skip to Content

U.S. Oil Companies Ignore Climate Change While the Rest of the Industry Evolves

Exxon Mobil and Chevron shareholders voted against climate measures, but the companies are holdouts in an industry that is starting to change its ways.

Big Oil isn’t going away anytime soon—and yet oil companies are under more pressure than ever to deal with the risks that climate change poses to their business and to the planet.

At their shareholder meetings yesterday, U.S. oil giants Chevron and Exxon Mobil avoided major insurrection, as big investors voted down a series of climate-related measures. Among them was a call for Exxon to acknowledge that limiting global warming to 2 °C was a “moral imperative,” and both companies faced initiatives that called for performing “stress tests” to determine how future climate policies could harm their bottom lines.

In his meeting address, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson declared, “Just saying turn the taps off is not acceptable to humanity”—strictly speaking, he is right. A company worth almost $375 billion cannot turn on a dime, and our oil- and gas-burning lifestyle won’t evaporate overnight.

Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson

But such comments mask the fact that oil and gas companies are approaching a crossroads. Exxon continues to behave as though economic growth and carbon emissions are one and the same—the company predicts that 60 percent of the world’s energy needs will still be met by oil and gas by 2040. But carbon emissions have decoupled from economic productivity. And the Paris climate accords could significantly impact demand for fossil if the signatory countries follow through on their promises.

Other oil companies seem to be getting the message. Shell recently announced the creation of a green energy arm that will be funded with $1.7 billion in investments. And French oil giant Total pledged to push 20 percent of its assets into low-carbon investments over the next 20 years. In a strategy paper (PDF) released Tuesday, Total’s CEO Patrick Pouyanne said that the Paris accords made it clear that there was a global mandate to try to limit global warming to that 2 °C threshold.

“COP21 was definitely a watershed,” he said, using the acronym for the Paris meeting. “Despite the current instability worldwide, 195 countries managed to unite around an ambitious climate agreement. That sends a strong message.”

In this light, Chevron and Exxon Mobil are looking more and more like holdouts—slow-moving dinosaurs who are behind on innovation, even. They appear to be banking on a business model that, while profitable for now, is unlikely to sustain them for much longer as the rest of the industry gets serious about transitioning away from fossil fuels.

(Read more: Wall Street Journal, Forbes, New York Times, The Guardian, “Our Energy Transformation in 2015,” “Carbon Dioxide Emissions Keep Falling in the U.S.,” “Big Oil Companies Have Already Become Dinosaurs”)

Keep Reading

Most Popular

A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook?

Robot vacuum companies say your images are safe, but a sprawling global supply chain for data from our devices creates risk.

A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate

Make Sunsets is already attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to provoke widespread criticism.

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2023

Every year, we pick the 10 technologies that matter the most right now. We look for advances that will have a big impact on our lives and break down why they matter.

These exclusive satellite images show that Saudi Arabia’s sci-fi megacity is well underway

Weirdly, any recent work on The Line doesn’t show up on Google Maps. But we got the images anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.