In announcing plans to buy AOL for $4.4 billion, Verizon is betting that it can lead the future of television as it explodes from the living room to computers, smartphones, and tablets. But at least in the near term, it faces plenty of headwinds.
The deal, rumored earlier this year, catapults the largest provider of wireless Internet service into the media and advertising technology businesses, in direct competition with companies such as Google and Facebook. Already in the television business with its FIOS cable TV alternative, Verizon now has the potential to help advertisers reach specific audiences viewing online video and TV–still by far the most lucrative ad medium–on any screen. That’s something no other company has yet managed to do.
Although AOL is still known first for its declining but profitable dial-up Internet access business and second for owning prominent sites such as Huffington Post and TechCrunch, its growth is now driven chiefly by enabling the sale of ads–especially video ads–on other sites. The deal, expected to close this summer, would end AOL’s rocky history as an independent company, which began in the 1980s with its pioneering Internet access service and peaked in 2000 when it acquired Time Warner for $164 billion–later seen as one of the most disastrous mergers in corporate history.
Since then, the company has struggled to regain relevance. Under CEO and former Google executive Tim Armstrong for the past six years, it has attempted to build a media business; more recently, via acquisitions such as the 2013 purchase of video ad exchange Adap.tv, it has been cobbling together technologies to automate the sale of video advertising on other sites.
That ad tech business, whose revenues rose 19 percent in the first quarter, is probably what attracted Verizon more than AOL’s media business, which grew only 8 percent. Chairman and CEO Lowell McAdam said his company has been investing in advertising technologies that can reach consumers on any screen, from smartphones to computers to TVs. In fact, it’s expected to launch a service this summer that would bundle TV and video content into a cable TV alternative.
Those ad revenue streams will depend, as they do at rivals such as Google and Facebook, on the adroit use of data. Verizon’s dream is clearly to create what would be the first system that ties together data from mobile devices, Web browsing, and TV set-top boxes. That way, it could offer advertisers an unprecedented view into the behavior of customers and prospective customers across all the media they consume.
In particular, as people increasingly watch TV and other video content on whatever screen they want, it’s difficult for advertisers to reach them in a unified way and track the sales impact of ads on multiple screens. AOL’s One ad targeting system, launched in April, could benefit from Verizon’s data on its users—especially its information on their location, such as in a store. Google, for instance, has recently been honing a service that uses smartphone location data to infer in-store sales. “This is a great way for Verizon to buy into the lucrative ad tech space quickly,” says consumer tech analyst Jan Dawson. “It’ll take time to build these linkages, but in time they could be quite powerful for advertisers.”
For all that, it’s debatable how much difference this deal will make for the media and advertising landscape, at least in the short term. Despite Armstrong’s efforts, the company remains distantly behind what has become an online ad duopoly. AOL had a tiny 0.74 percent share of the $145 billion worldwide online ad business last year, according to eMarketer, while Google led with 31.4 percent and Facebook weighed in with 7.9 percent.
The deal also has the whiff of AOL’s disastrous 2000 merger with Time Warner, but this time AOL is a much smaller, more dubious savior. (As ProPublica assistant managing editor Scott Klein put it in a cutting tweet: “Another old person tricked into buying AOL so they can connect to the Internet.”) In short, neither company has led advertising’s migration to digital devices, and it’s not clear Verizon has the means to join the leaders that already have a multiyear head start. “The road to where a Verizon-AOL combination gets in the league of Google or Facebook is long indeed,” says former AOL ad executive Eric Bosco, CEO of the online ad-targeting firm ChoiceStream.
Not least among its problems, Verizon runs big risks even using the data at the heart of the deal. Last year it added identifiers for tracking people on their phones, similar to the cookies advertisers use to track users across the Web, which don’t work well on mobile devices. But it ran into trouble when privacy advocates realized that those “supercookies” couldn’t be deleted. “It’s going to be very dangerous for Verizon if the data is seen as an entity in itself that is handed over to Unilever and other big advertisers,” says Andrew Bloom, senior vice president of strategic business development at Sizmek, which helps advertisers and ad agencies run online ad campaigns.
Why China is still obsessed with disinfecting everything
Most public health bodies dealing with covid have long since moved on from the idea of surface transmission. China’s didn’t—and that helps it control the narrative about the disease’s origins and danger.
These materials were meant to revolutionize the solar industry. Why hasn’t it happened?
Perovskites are promising, but real-world conditions have held them back.
Anti-aging drugs are being tested as a way to treat covid
Drugs that rejuvenate our immune systems and make us biologically younger could help protect us from the disease’s worst effects.
A quick guide to the most important AI law you’ve never heard of
The European Union is planning new legislation aimed at curbing the worst harms associated with artificial intelligence.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.