Skip to Content

Why the World Needs Anonymous

There’s a noble imperative behind not revealing who you are.

Anonymity is under attack. “It’s time to end anonymous comments sections,” implored a recent op-ed in the Washington Post. In the U.K., a parliamentary committee has argued for a “cultural shift” in favor of treating pseudonymous comments as untrustworthy. There’s even a popular Swedish TV show devoted to tracking down and publicly shaming people who post nasty anonymous comments online (see “The Troll Hunters”).

Gabriella Coleman
Gabriella Coleman

Anonymity’s value seems to be at a new low, and it’s happening against a backdrop of never-ending surveillance. If it’s not CCTV cameras watching our every move, it’s companies and governments harvesting our digital data.

Anonymous speech may seem like the spawn of recent technology, but in truth there’s a long history of anonymity being used for a positive purpose. The Federalist Papers were originally published under a pseudonym. The Supreme Court has repeatedly granted First Amendment protection to anonymous speech.

Imagine if everyone were forced to disclose their real identities online. We’d be discouraging potential whistle-blowers. We’d be discouraging anyone who wanted to voice an unpopular belief. Yes, anonymity can engender antisocial behavior—but it can also provide a means of pushing back against increased surveillance.

As an anthropologist, I’ve spent half a dozen years studying Anonymous, the collective best known for its crusades against dictators and corporations. My studies of this ragtag band of hackers and rabble-rousers has revealed to me how important the prospect of anonymity remains.

The group’s ethic is partly indebted to 4chan, a popular and subversive image board that enforced the name “Anonymous” for all users, thus hatching the idea’s potential. One activist explained the crucial role of 4chan in cementing “the primary ideal of Anonymous”: “The posts on 4chan have no names or any identifiable markers attached to them. The only thing you are able to judge a post by is its content and nothing else.”

Why care about this, if you’re not an activist? You should care because Anonymous functions as a social laboratory where participants experiment with the power, threat, and promise of anonymity itself. Anonymous political acts are often portrayed as cowardly, but we can just as easily observe a noble imperative—anonymity displaces attention from the messenger to the message.

Gabriella Coleman is the author of Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous.

This post was updated on December 18, 2014.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

This startup wants to copy you into an embryo for organ harvesting

With plans to create realistic synthetic embryos, grown in jars, Renewal Bio is on a journey to the horizon of science and ethics.

VR is as good as psychedelics at helping people reach transcendence

On key metrics, a VR experience elicited a response indistinguishable from subjects who took medium doses of LSD or magic mushrooms.

This nanoparticle could be the key to a universal covid vaccine

Ending the covid pandemic might well require a vaccine that protects against any new strains. Researchers may have found a strategy that will work.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.