Google Finally Gets Legal OK to Scan the World’s Books
In 2002, a 29-year-old computer scientist and entrepreneur in California named Larry Page decided that his young company, Google, should digitize every book in the world to make them searchable. Page asked an employee named Marissa Mayer to help test the idea by turning pages to the beat of a metronome as he snapped digital photos.
Results were good, and the project went public late in 2004. High profile partners such as New York Public Library and the libraries of Oxford and Harvard universities signed on. But in 2005 a series of legal challenges began that accused the company of copyright infringement and soon paralyzed the project. Last year, MIT Technology Review looked back at the effort and declared: “A decade after it began, Page’s bold project has stalled.”
Today Page’s bold project is back on track, after a federal judge in New York ruled that the effort is covered by “fair use” exceptions to copyright restrictions:
“In my view, Google Books provides significant public benefits. It advances the progress of the arts and sciences … without adversely impacting the rights of copyright holders.”
That vindicates Google’s approach to copyrighted works, which is to scan them in full but only show short excerpts in search results, along with directions to where the full text can be accessed or paid for.
Google has yet to issue a statement on today’s judgment. Whatever the company does next, the task of a competing project launched by Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society is now more complicated. Known as the Digital Public Library of America, the effort has attracted major backers but struggled to define what exactly it will offer and in which form (see “The Library of Utopia”).
Perhaps the clearest winner today is the now somewhat dusty utopian belief that the Web should be used to open up access to the entirety of our civilization’s knowledge. As the reaction of New York University academic and Internet intellectual Clay Shirky highlights, this ruling affects more than just Google.
This just in: Search engines are legal http://t.co/HoW7Yv5QX0— Clay Shirky (@cshirky) November 14, 2013
Any U.S. company or organization is now free to make exploring the world’s books as easy as typing in a search box.
Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build
“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”
ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it
The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.
Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives
The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.
Learning to code isn’t enough
Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.