Avoiding the Power Grid

A cheaper fuel cell could provide affordable power for microgrids.

David Talbotarchive page

October 22, 2013

A one-meter-square gray box studded  with green lights sits in a hallway near the laboratory of materials scientist Eric Wachsman, director of the Energy Research Center at the University of Maryland. It is a mockup of a fuel-cell device that runs on natural gas, producing electricity at the same cost as a large gas plant.

The box is designed to house stacks of solid-oxide fuel cells that differ from their conventional counterparts in a dramatic way: they’re projected to produce electricity for $1 per watt, down from $8 in today’s commercial versions, thanks to improvements that Wachsman has made in the ceramic materials at their heart.

The technology could eventually become a practical and affordable way to ease strain on the increasingly stressed electricity grid; anywhere there’s cheap natural gas, we could also have constant and cheap electricity.

The fuel cell’s ceramic plates are made with powders based on cerium oxide, perovskite, nickel oxide, and bismuth oxide.

After being mixed with solvents, nickel oxide and cerium oxide are poured on a plastic substrate. This will become the anode, or negatively charged electrode, in the finished cell.

That would make it possible to do away with the diesel generators that are now widely used for backup power and as a key component of microgrids in places like Malaysia and cellular base stations in rural areas around the world. Solid-oxide fuel cells—which can run on diesel fuel or gasoline, not just natural gas—use much less fuel per watt than diesel generators of similar size.

Five similar layers, including an electrolyte made from cerium oxide (on top, above other anode layers), are prepared.

Left: After baking, the layers have become a ceramic plate measuring 100 square centimeters.
Right: After baking, the layers have become a ceramic plate measuring 100 square centimeters.

Conventional solid-oxide fuel cells run at high temperatures, making them more expensive and prone to performance losses. A key advance in the Maryland fuel cell is that it is based on cerium oxide and bismuth oxide, which are far more electrically conductive than materials used in commercial versions and produce much more electricity per square centimeter. The cell can operate at 650 °C, down from 900 °C in existing products, reducing thermal stresses and insulation needs. And the final product is made of 32 stacks, each of which can be replaced if it fails.

Three such ceramic plates are assembled into a stack atop one of two metal interconnects that will control the flow of gas into, and electricity out of, the stack.

A short test stack, clamped to a benchtop, includes electrical leads as well as tubes that convey air and natural gas and vent exhaust. This setup produces 600 watts.

In a real unit, the green lights on this mockup would show that each stack is functioning. A red light would indicate that a stack needs replacing.

The gray box mocks up a 25-kilowatt version of the technology, which is now under development by a startup called Redox Power Systems. Redox is building a factory in Melbourne, Florida, and hopes to launch the product in 2014. A 25-kilowatt fuel cell is enough to power a small strip mall; units that are smaller still could serve a single house. In the long term, the technology could even be put into hybrid vehicles to charge their batteries, since it is both lighter than an internal-combustion engine and more efficient at producing electricity.

A mockup of a finished 25-kilowatt solid-oxide fuel cell generator, roughly one cubic meter in size, includes space for 32 fuel-cell stacks in a central housing.

But the stand-alone generators, if successful, would be impressive enough. They’d mean “we’re on par with conventional power generation,” Wachsman says. “It’s not just backup power—it’s energy security.”