Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Google, Facebook, and Microsoft Express Sudden, Renewed Interest in Surveillance Transparency

The U.S. government should allow disclosure of how often NSA taps into user data, argue Facebook, Microsoft, and Google
June 12, 2013

Facebook, Google, and Microsoft today called publicly on the U.S. government to allow them to reveal statistics on how much intelligence agencies tap into their data.

The three were among nine Internet companies named last week in leaked slides about an NSA surveillance program called PRISM. Their statements may be a sign that the companies worry about being tainted by public concerns over the scope of the surveillance programs. Up to now the companies’ responses to the leaks had been limited to carefully worded, selective denials that they knew of a program called PRISM or that the NSA had “direct access” to their data stores.

Blog posts by the CEOs of Facebook and Google last Friday avoided the bigger question of whether the NSA had any access at all to their users’ files, probably because the legal instruments used by the agency forbid those asked to hand over data from disclosing anything about the request. Today’s statements were much clearer and implicitly acknowledged that the NSA does access user data from the companies.

Google’s chief legal officer, David Drummond, noted in his blog post today that Google’s annual transparency report, which summarizes the number of law-enforcement requests for user data, has always omitted figures on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act requests such as those used by the NSA:

“We therefore ask you to help make it possible for Google to publish aggregate numbers of national security requests, including FISA disclosures—in terms of both the number we receive and their scope.”

Microsoft, which also publishes a transparency report, e-mailed a statement to Reuters that said:

“Permitting greater transparency on the aggregate volume and scope of national security requests, including FISA orders, would help the community understand and debate these important issues.”

Facebook has never published figures on data requests and started its statement today from chief consul Ted Ullyot with the somewhat dubious claim that being unable to disclose FISA requests was the reason why. Ullyot wrote that the U.S. government should allow companies to publish “information about the size and scope of national security requests we receive.” He added that “[we] look forward to publishing a report that includes that information.”

Taken together, the statements from Google, Facebook, and Microsoft suggest that the companies are tired of taking flak for their involvement in surveillance programs that current U.S. law prevents them from resisting or even talking about. However, it’s fair to ask why the three have not made similar public statements before, given that the laws that allow the operation of programs like PRISM have been on the books for years.

Deep Dive

Uncategorized

Our best illustrations of 2022

Our artists’ thought-provoking, playful creations bring our stories to life, often saying more with an image than words ever could.

How CRISPR is making farmed animals bigger, stronger, and healthier

These gene-edited fish, pigs, and other animals could soon be on the menu.

The Download: the Saudi sci-fi megacity, and sleeping babies’ brains

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. These exclusive satellite images show Saudi Arabia’s sci-fi megacity is well underway In early 2021, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia announced The Line: a “civilizational revolution” that would house up…

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2023

Every year, we pick the 10 technologies that matter the most right now. We look for advances that will have a big impact on our lives and break down why they matter.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.