The company’s methods of financing its R&D operations, which in 2011 were based almost exclusively in the United States, are among the tactics at the center of the controversy.
Between 2009 and 2012, Apple—the U.S.-based entity we all know and love—contributed a total of $4 billion to research and product development and had pretax earnings of $38.7 billion, according to the Senate’s investigation released Monday. That’s a cost-to-profits ratio of 7:1.
By contrast, Apple’s Ireland subsidiary, Apple Sales International, assigned $4.9 billion to R&D and returned $74 billion in pretax earnings, a cost-to-profit ratio of 15:1. The Senate report says this is evidence of Apple’s (entirely legal) evasion strategy:
The figures disclose that Apple’s Irish subsidiary, ASI, profited more than twice as much as Apple Inc. itself from the intellectual property that was largely developed in the United States by Apple Inc. personnel. That relative imbalance suggests that the cost-sharing arrangement for Apple Inc. makes little economic sense without the tax effects of directing $74 billion in worldwide sales revenue away from the United States to Ireland, where it undergoes minimal—or perhaps—no taxation due to ASI’s alleged non-tax resident status.
Cook defended Apple’s practices before a Senate panel, testifying that cost-sharing arrangements help Apple to use foreign revenues to keep high-paying R&D jobs in the United States. It’s also highly unlikely that Apple is alone among tech companies in using such methods.
It is worth noting, however, that Apple actually spends relatively small sums on R&D relative to peers like Google and Microsoft, even as it generates record profits. Last quarter, for example, it devoted 2.5 percent of its revenue to R&D, compared with Google’s 13 percent (see “Apple’s R&D Spending Rises, But It’s Still Small Change”). In light of these tax revelations, it appears that Apple is even more efficient than previously suspected at squeezing value out of its meager R&D budget.
The big new idea for making self-driving cars that can go anywhere
The mainstream approach to driverless cars is slow and difficult. These startups think going all-in on AI will get there faster.
Inside Charm Industrial’s big bet on corn stalks for carbon removal
The startup used plant matter and bio-oil to sequester thousands of tons of carbon. The question now is how reliable, scalable, and economical this approach will prove.
The hype around DeepMind’s new AI model misses what’s actually cool about it
Some worry that the chatter about these tools is doing the whole field a disservice.
The dark secret behind those cute AI-generated animal images
Google Brain has revealed its own image-making AI, called Imagen. But don't expect to see anything that isn't wholesome.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.