If Germany is to meet its ambitious goals of getting a third of its electricity from renewable energy by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050, it must find a way to store huge quantities of electricity in order to make up for the intermittency of renewable energy.
Siemens says it has just the technology: electrolyzer plants, each the size of a large warehouse, that split water to make hydrogen gas. The hydrogen could be used when the wind isn’t blowing to generate electricity in gas-fired power plants, or it could be used to fuel cars.
Producing hydrogen is an inefficient way to store energy—about two-thirds of the power is lost in the processes of making the hydrogen and using the hydrogen to generate electricity. But Siemens says it’s the only storage option that can achieve the scale that’s going to be needed in Germany.
Unlike conventional industrial electrolyzers, which need a fairly steady supply of power to efficiently split water, Siemens’s new design is flexible enough to run on intermittent power from wind turbines. It’s based on proton-exchange membrane technology similar to that used in fuel cells for cars, which can operate at widely different power levels. The electrolyzers can also temporarily operate at two to three times their rated power levels, which could be useful for accommodating surges in power on windy days.
Germany, which has led the world in installing solar capacity, isn’t just concerned about climate change. Its leaders think that in the long term, renewable energy will be cheaper than fossil fuels, so it could give the country an economic advantage, says Miranda Schreurs, director of the Environmental Policy Research Center at the Freie Universität Berlin. Germany will serve as a test case to show whether industrialized countries can compete while relying on renewables.
Another reason Germany is turning to renewable energy is to meet its goal of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases by 40 percent by 2020, relative to 1990 levels, and by 80 percent by 2050. Some other countries have similarly ambitious carbon dioxide reduction goals, but Germany stands out because it’s a large economy that depends on cheap electricity to make manufactured goods. It has decided to not to use nuclear power as a source of steady, carbon-free electricity. And it can’t rely heavily on natural gas, which emits about half as much carbon dioxide as coal. Natural gas is more expensive in Europe than in the United States, and it comes from countries such as Russia that aren’t always reliable suppliers.
Keeping electricity costs low while transitioning toward renewable power will be difficult. Solar power is far more expensive than fossil-fuel power, especially in Germany, where skies are often cloudy. And although wind power is already nearly as cheap as fossil-fuel power—which is why Germany is starting to shift its policies to favor wind—like solar, it is intermittent: even some of the best-situated wind turbines generate electricity only a third of the time.
Ensuring reliable power supplies will therefore require installing high-voltage power lines to get renewable energy from places that happen to be sunny or windy to the places energy is needed. Germany is already struggling with limits to its ability to transmit its existing renewable energy supply, which accounts for about 20 percent of its electricity: according to Siemens, Germany throws away 20 percent of the power its wind turbines produce because it doesn’t have enough transmission capacity.
Renewable energy will require very large-scale energy storage. The most affordable way to store electricity is to use it to pump water up a hill, and then let it flow down again to spin a turbine and generator when electricity is needed. But this only works in places where there are hills and dams, and most of Germany is flat.
The total amount of pumped-water storage in Germany now is about 40 gigawatt-hours—no more than renewable sources could generate in an hour on a sunny and windy day, says Michael Weinhold, Siemens Energy’s chief technology officer. “They were not made for buffering hours or days, or even weeks, of volatility.”
Right now, batteries are far too expensive—and not nearly enough are being made to accommodate the scale required. It would take the battery capacity of millions of electric vehicles to equal the existing pumped-water storage capacity.
Germany does, however, have the potential to store a vast amount of hydrogen, because it’s possible to mix small amounts of hydrogen into existing natural gas pipelines and storage containers. These offer enough capacity to store about two weeks of current renewable energy production in Germany. Salt caverns, some of which are now used to store Germany’s strategic oil reserve, could provide far more storage.
Siemens estimates that generating 85 percent of Germany’s electricity using renewables will require 30,000 gigawatt-hours of storage. The hydrogen needed to supply that much electricity could be stored in a quarter of the space available in underground caverns. The hydrogen could be distributed initially through existing natural gas pipelines, and eventually through dedicated pipelines.
Siemens says its electrolyzers are about 60 percent efficient; 40 percent of the energy generated by a wind turbine would be lost making hydrogen gas. Then at least 40 percent of the energy in the hydrogen would be lost in generating electricity in gas-fired power plants or fuel cells. So only about a third of the original energy would be retained. But Weinhold says the system would make hydrogen from electricity that couldn’t otherwise be used on the grid and therefore would be wasted without such a storage system.
In addition to being inefficient, the system could be expensive. The high cost of fuel cells is a key reason they haven’t been used widely in cars. But Weinhold says Siemens is working to bring down costs. Siemens is conducting pilot demonstrations of the technology this year, and it plans to sell two-megawatt systems by 2015 and to build systems as large as 250 megawatts by 2018. The largest plants could harness the power produced by about 100 wind turbines.
This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
The tool, called Nightshade, messes up training data in ways that could cause serious damage to image-generating AI models.
The Biggest Questions: What is death?
New neuroscience is challenging our understanding of the dying process—bringing opportunities for the living.
Rogue superintelligence and merging with machines: Inside the mind of OpenAI’s chief scientist
An exclusive conversation with Ilya Sutskever on his fears for the future of AI and why they’ve made him change the focus of his life’s work.
How to fix the internet
If we want online discourse to improve, we need to move beyond the big platforms.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.