During the early years of the Iraq War, John Tirman wondered about the extent of the civilian casualties but could uncover little information. Though a team of epidemiologists based at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health had published a survey in the Lancet in 2004 estimating that there had been nearly 100,000 “excess deaths” during the first 18 months of the war, the findings had been largely ignored by the media. “I found this to be both troubling and puzzling,” says Tirman, executive director of MIT’s Center for International Studies.
Around the same time, a rash of insurgencies broke out among Sunni Arabs in Iraq. Many academics saw this as a function of the Sunnis’ fight to retain their top-tier status, Tirman says, but he considered that explanation inadequate. The uprisings were “popping up all over Iraq, seemingly disconnected from each other, with no ideology, no demands except that the U.S. should leave,” he says. He reasoned that they might be a reaction to the large numbers of civilian casualties. “I had suspected that life for civilians was rougher than what was being reported, and the Hopkins study confirmed that mortality was high,” he says. “The two fit together as cause and effect—a cycle, in fact, of escalating violence.”
Tirman commissioned a second, more extensive survey from the Hopkins team; it showed much higher civilian casualty rates. The results appeared in the Lancet in 2006, attracting media attention that generated some negative reactions. President Bush called the report “not credible,” disparaging the methodology as “pretty much discredited.” Others said the study was inaccurate and biased. But Tirman believed that many of the attacks were politically motivated.
Tirman decided to write a book about the moral, political, strategic, and methodological questions involved in estimating noncombatants killed in U.S. wars. While researching The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America’s Wars, he concluded that the U.S. military’s ability to record civilian deaths is limited, in part because officers can report only what they have seen and can’t always distinguish between enemy fighters and noncombatants. He also found that historically, neither the military nor the U.S. public has demanded information about civilian casualties.
As Americans, he says, “we simply do not think about how much our wars are costing local populations”; without knowing how many civilians actually died, we tend to believe that any collateral damage, while unfortunate, is justified. “The implication is we should do this again when the occasion arises,” he says. “It’s important that we know how many people died, and it’s important we know how many people were displaced, lost their homes, were widowed and impoverished. That has implications for the next time we face an international challenge.”
He adds, “What I really aimed to do is start an argument. I don’t think I’ve written the last word on this—just opened up some questions. But they are questions too few people have been asking.”
From the MIT community
Einstein on the Road
By Josef Eisinger, PhD ‘51
Prometheus Books, 2011, $25.00
Financial Systems in Developing Economies: Growth, Inequality, and Policy Evaluation in Thailand
By Robert M. Townsend, professor of economics
Oxford University Press, 2011, $85.00
Moving Boxes by Air: The Economics of International Air Cargo
By Peter S. Morrell, SM ‘78
Ashgate, 2011, $99.95
The Complete Idiot’s Guide to SQL
By Steven Holzner ‘79
Alpha, 2011, $19.95
Too Much to Dream: A Psychedelic American Boyhood
By Peter Bebergal, MIT Technology Licensing Office communications associate
Soft Skull Press, 2011, $15.95
More Mathematical Finance
By Mark Joshi, PhD ‘94
Pilot Whale Press, 2011, $80.00
Trade of the Tricks: Inside the Magician’s Craft
By Graham M. Jones, assistant professor of anthropology
University of California Press, 2011, $29.95
Changing Directions: A Concise Guide to the Topology of Tango
By David M. Caditz ‘83
Lulu.com, 2011, $31.95
Please submit titles of books and papers published in 2011 and 2012 to be considered for this column.
Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build
“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”
ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it
The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.
Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives
The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.
Learning to code isn’t enough
Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.