Skip to Content

It’s Official: Apple Is Now More ‘Open’ than Google

Google promised that Android would be open source …

Quick, which tech powerhouse’s flagship mobile product came out dead last in a systematic survey of the openness of eight open-source software projects?

Look who’s pushing around device manufacturers now

You’d be forgiven for saying “Apple,” considering that the Cupertino-based company makes no bones about locking down its mobile iOS and app store tighter than a bicycle left outdoors in Manhattan. But it turns out that Google, which has become increasingly “meh” with regard to its famous mantra in direct proportion to its growth and profitability, is now the home of the least open open-source project evaluated: Android.

Indeed, Android was the only project evaluated by VisionMobile (pdf) to score less than 58 percent, compared to the Apple-sponsored WebKit browser project’s 68 percent. (Webkit powers all versions of Apple’s Safari browser, as well as Mail and other OS X applicaitons.)

The reasons for Android’s poor showing were straightforward: the project has no real public roadmap, and decisions about the future of Android are made unilaterally by Google. Funny how it turns out that throwing code over the wall whenever the company feels like it does not an open-source project make.

Webkit, on the other hand, even bested the famously open-source-friendly Mozilla foundation’s Firefox browser (which scored 65 percent). No wonder, then, that Google feels safe basing its own browser—Chrome—on top of the relatively open and democratic WebKit standard.

via Ars

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language

For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.

Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death

Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.