Skip to Content
Uncategorized

NASA Releases New Pioneer Anomaly Analysis

The mysterious force acting on the Pioneer spacecraft seems to be falling exponentially. That’s a strong clue that on-board heat is to blame, says NASA.
In the early 1970s, NASA sent two spacecraft on a roller coaster ride towards the outer Solar System. Pioneer 10 and 11 travelled past Jupiter (and Saturn in Pioneer 11’s case) and are now heading out into interstellar space.
But in 2002, physicists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, noticed a puzzling phenomenon. The spacecraft are slowing down. Nobody knows why but NASA analysed 11 years of tracking data for Pioneer 10 and 3 years for Pioneer 11 to prove it.
This deceleration, the Pioneer anomaly, has become one of the biggest problems in astrophysics. One idea is that gravity is different at theses distances (Pioneers 10 and 11 are now at 30 and 70 AU). That would be the most exciting conclusion.
But before astrophysicists can accept this, other more mundane explanations have to be ruled out. Chief among these is the possibility that the deceleration is caused by heat from the spacecraft’s radioactive batteries, which may radiate more in one direction than another.
Back in March, physicists from Europe claimed that a new computer model of heat emission from the spacecraft had finally nailed the problem. This proved that heat was to blame, they said.
NASA, which has its own team looking at this, has kept quiet about this result and today we can see why. Slava Turyshev at JPL and a few pals say they’ve trawled through JPL’s records looking for more data. And they’ve found it.
These guys say they’ve been able to double the datasets for both spacecraft. That increases the tracking data for Pioneer 10 to 23 years and Pioneer 11 to 11 years. That’s a jump from 20,055 to 41,054 data points for Pioneer 10 and from 10,616 to 81,537 for Pioneer 11.
So what does it show? Firstly, the new data confirms that anomalous deceleration exists.
But it also throws up something interesting. Turyshev and co say there appears to be an exponential drop in the size of the anomalous deceleration over time. It’s not easy to see in the data for sure, but there are certainly signs it is there.
That’s an important clue. Pioneer 10 and 11 are powered by the radioactive decay of plutonium-238, which of course decays exponentially.
NASA is currently performing its own computer simulation of the way that heat is emitted by the spacecraft to see whether it can explain the new dataset.
All the clues point to the notion that heat can explain the Pioneer anomaly. As Turyshev and co put it: “The most likely cause of the Pioneer anomaly is the anisotropic emission of on-board heat.”
So it looks as if NASA is set to agree with the European conclusion and that astronomers will soon be able to put this great mystery to rest once and for all.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1107.2886: Support For Temporally Varying Behavior Of The Pioneer Anomaly From The Extended Pioneer 10 and 11 Doppler Data Sets

Keep Reading

Most Popular

individual aging affects covid outcomes concept
individual aging affects covid outcomes concept

Anti-aging drugs are being tested as a way to treat covid

Drugs that rejuvenate our immune systems and make us biologically younger could help protect us from the disease’s worst effects.

close up of baby with a bottle
close up of baby with a bottle

The baby formula shortage has birthed a shady online marketplace

Desperate parents just want to feed their babies. They’re having to contend with misinformation, price gouging, and scams along the way.

"Olive Garden" NFTs concept
"Olive Garden" NFTs concept

I tried to buy an Olive Garden NFT. All I got was heartburn.

Our newest issue spells out what you need to know about the dizzying world of digital money.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.