Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Bing Is Copying Your Clicks, Not Google’s Results

Google’s results can be accessed because Bing is snooping on IE users.
February 2, 2011

Microsoft started a metaphorical war with Google when it launched the Bing search engine two years ago. Yesterday it came close to becoming literal after Google told Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land that it had gathered evidence that Bing was copying its search results.

In a kind of sting operation, Google rigged its own search engine last December to display certain results for a small set of nonsense search terms. When those same, fake, results began to sometimes be spat out by Bing in response to the same nonsense search terms, Google’s engineers concluded they had been robbed. Its equivalent to the maker of a map adding fake features so as to spot competitors ripping it off.

However, it seems more accurate to describe users of Internet Explorer and the Bing toolbar as the targets of Bing’s snooping, not Google. At least, that’s my read on what Microsoft’s head of search engineering Harry Shum said after Google’s principal search engineer Matt Cutts rounded on him Tuesday during a panel at an event on search technology hosted by BigThink in San Francisco.

“It’s not like we copy anything, we actually learn from the customer based on what they type and what they click on,” said Shum, “of course we track our users and what they do.”

Shum didn’t quite spell it out - no one at Microsoft has yet - but with those words and others he clearly suggested that Bing was tracking the activity of users across many websites with a view to improving Bing. It’s easy to see how some knowledge of what people are typing and clicking online could help build associations to boost Bing’s relevance. Because Google is such a big property using that tactic would of course capture a lot of interaction with their results. It also suggests that Bing may have some interesting data on how people use Facebook - the site that occupies more of US web time than any other.

Cutts countered Shum’s line by claiming that users were unaware that their data would be used in such ways, and would be unhappy with that if they found out. (It should be noted that Google’s own toolbar tracks plenty of information on web use and that the firm’s Google Analytics package tracks clicks from unsuspecting users for thousands of website that use it.)

For Web users the real question that emerges from this spat is not whether Google was copied, but whether you mind Microsoft watching your clicks.

Deep Dive

Uncategorized

Embracing CX in the metaverse

More than just meeting customers where they are, the metaverse offers opportunities to transform customer experience.

Identity protection is key to metaverse innovation

As immersive experiences in the metaverse become more sophisticated, so does the threat landscape.

The modern enterprise imaging and data value chain

For both patients and providers, intelligent, interoperable, and open workflow solutions will make all the difference.

Scientists have created synthetic mouse embryos with developed brains

The stem-cell-derived embryos could shed new light on the earliest stages of human pregnancy.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.