Skip to Content
Tech policy

The Misleading Myth Of The Corked Bat

The belief that a baseball can be hit further with a corked bat is wrong. But these illegal bats may still give an unfair advantage.

In June 2003, the world of baseball was shocked by the revelation that Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs, one of the game’s finest sluggers, had been caught using an illegal bat.

So-called “corked” bats have been hollowed out and filled with a lighter material, such as cork, to disguise the modification. They are illegal because they allow batters to hit the ball further, or so the anecdotal evidence suggestions. The question for science, of course, is whether this effect is real: do corked bats really send balls further?

The reason bats are modified in this way is to make them lighter. This allows the hitter to swing them faster. But if the goal is to give the ball the highest possible velocity as it leaves the bat, lighter is not necessarily better. In fact the collision efficiency, the ratio of ball velocities before and after being hit, is lower for a lighter bat.

There is another factor, the so-called trampoline effect in which the surface of a hollowed out bat deforms and reforms like a trampoline, thereby increasing the elasticity of the collision. This is known to occur in hollow metal bats but whether this holds true for wooden ones is still open.

Whether a corked bat gives and unfair advantage boils down to how these factors even out under the the kind of ball speeds that occur in a real game.

Today, we have an answer thanks to some intriguing work by Alan Nathan at the University of Illinois and a few buddies. They’ve built a cannon capable of firing baseballs in a highly controlled fashion. They’ve used their machine to send balls at baseball bats modified in various ways and then measured the speed at which the balls impact and rebound.

This they say has allowed them to settle the matter.

They have two results. First, they say the trampoline effect is negligible in corked bats. In other words, there is no increase in the elasticity of the bat-ball collision.

Second, they investigated the trade off between higher bat speed and lower collision efficiency and found no benefit to a corked bat.

“We conclude that there is no advantage to corking a bat if the goal is for the batted ball speed to be as large as possible, as is the case for a home run hitter,” they say.

However, there is a caveat. Being able to swing the bat faster allows the hitter to delay the swing for a crucial extra fraction of a second. And this may allow more accurate hits. “So, while corking may not allow a batter to hit the ball farther, it may well allow a batter to hit the ball solidly more often,” say Nathan and co.

That could be a significant effect. The study shows that corked bats don’t allow balls to be hit any further but this has nothing to do with the question of whether corked bats allow home runs to be hit more often.

That’s something that will require a carefully designed study to untangle. In the meantime, corked bats may still confer an advantage, just not in the way everyone thought.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1009.2549: Corked Bats, Juiced Balls, and Humidors: The Physics of Cheating in Baseball

Deep Dive

Tech policy

wet market selling fish
wet market selling fish

This scientist now believes covid started in Wuhan’s wet market. Here’s why.

How a veteran virologist found fresh evidence to back up the theory that covid jumped from animals to humans in a notorious Chinese market—rather than emerged from a lab leak.

Conceptual illustration showing a file folder with the China flag and various papers flying out of it
Conceptual illustration showing a file folder with the China flag and various papers flying out of it

The US crackdown on Chinese economic espionage is a mess. We have the data to show it.

The US government’s China Initiative sought to protect national security. In the most comprehensive analysis of cases to date, MIT Technology Review reveals how far it has strayed from its goals.

Harvard University professor Charles Lieber leaves federal court, Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2021
Harvard University professor Charles Lieber leaves federal court, Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2021

The China Initiative’s first academic guilty verdict raises more questions than it answers

Observers hoped that the trial of the prominent Harvard professor Charles Lieber would provide some clues into the future of the Department of Justice’s campaign against Chinese economic espionage.

twitter polarizes audience
twitter polarizes audience

This is one reason why being online felt so bad in 2021

New data shows just how polarized political conversation is in the US and hints at what might come during the 2022 midterms.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.