New Inks Could Mean Cheaper OLED Screens
Organic light emitting diode, or OLED, displays seem to have it all: energy efficiency and a beautiful, crisp picture that refreshes rapidly. But it’s difficult to make them on a large scale, so OLED televisions remain very expensive. Last week, DuPont Displays announced the development of a manufacturing process that the company says can be used to print large, high-performance OLED televisions at volumes that should bring down costs. Using a custom-made printer from Japanese manufacturer Dainippon Screen, DuPont says it can print a 50 inch-television in under two minutes, and testing of the displays shows their performance is reliable–the displays should last 15 years.
Display makers have struggled to scale up the manufacturing of OLEDs while maintaining high performance and low costs. “The key question is, when you scale up, does the cost per square inch drop or go up?” says William Feehery, president of DuPont Displays.
OLEDs on the market today rely on an expensive, small-scale technique called shadow-mask evaporation to pattern the light-emitting organic molecules that make up the pixels in these displays. LG’s 15-inch OLED television, the biggest on the market, is set to come out in the United States this year at a cost of $2,725. At these prices, OLEDs can’t compete with liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), which are relatively inexpensive because manufacturers can make them at large volumes.
One of the most promising alternatives to shadow-mask deposition is printing, which is compatible with manufacturing large screens. But printing is difficult to do reliably, and the resulting devices have lagged behind the performance and durability of those made using conventional techniques. It’s been a major materials challenge to develop inks that won’t bleed during the printing process, that have the desired electrical and optical properties, and that don’t deteriorate over time.
OLED displays are made up of 12 to 15 layers of materials. In each pixel the red, green, and blue light-emitting materials are positioned side by side and sandwiched between materials that bring electrical current in and out of the device and that allow light to leave it. When these layers blend together during printing, device performance suffers.
DuPont has addressed this problem by using active molecules in the inks used to print each layer that are insoluble in the inks used to print the adjacent layers. This is more complex than it may sound, says Feehery. “Each of these materials is a major development effort on its own, and having to tie it to the ones above and below it imposes a lot of constraints,” he says.
The company worked with Dainippon Screen to develop a multi-nozzle printer for the new inks. “The Dainippon printer works like a garden hose,” says Feehery. It generates a continuous stream of ink, rather than droplets, and moves over a surface at rates of four to five meters per second while patterning a display. DuPont says that its red, green, and blue OLED materials can make displays that will last 15 years. (Reliability over time has been a concern for printed OLEDs.)
Feehery says DuPont’s process is simple enough to compete on cost with LCDs. “Now we can say it works, and is worth scaling up,” says Feehery. DuPont will license the manufacturing process and sell the materials to display manufacturers.
The company will face competition, though. Many other companies are working on OLED inks, including Universal Display Corporation in the United States, Merck in Germany, and Sumitomo Chemical in Japan. And Kateeva, a startup in Menlo Park, CA, is developing OLED-printing equipment that combines the volume of ink-jet printing with the performance of devices made through shadow-mask fabrication.
The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it
Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.
How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language
For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.
Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?
An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.
Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death
Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.