Skip to Content

Drowning in Data

February 23, 2010

The personalized-medicine industry aims to convert information about an individual’s genome into useful diagnostic tests and targeted drug treatments. Companies that deal with gathering the information–sequencing genomes and identifying genetic variations–have made impressive technical advances that have dramatically reduced the cost of analyzing DNA (see “Faster Tools to Scrutinize the Genome”). Now the biggest challenge lies in interpreting the huge volume of genetic data being generated. Studies have identified thousands of candidates for genes underlying common diseases, for example, but it’s not clear how to make that information medically useful.

The problem is going to get worse before it gets better. Most genetic variation discovered to date accounts for a fairly small percentage of the overall risk of disease. Countless genetic variations are still hidden in our genomes. As scientists begin to uncover the remaining genetic culprits, they will need to develop ways to interpret what those variations mean for individual health. “The field urgently needs a breakthrough in the way we analyze such data, or we will end up with a collection of data … unable to predict anything,” wrote Serge Koscielny, a researcher at the National Institute of Health and Medical Research in Villejuif, France, in the journal Science Translational Medicine in January.

Efforts to find solutions are just beginning. Personal-genomics companies such as 23andMe and Navigenics have developed their own algorithms for combining different genetic risk factors into a predictive risk score. And Knome, a personal-sequencing startup based in Cambridge, MA, is taking this strategy one step further by developing software to analyze entire genome sequences. But it will be impossible to develop effective analysis methods–or weigh their predictive power–without large databases that pair individuals’ genome sequences with their medical records.

Genetic tests and therapeutics also face an economic challenge: who will pay for them? Insurance companies will not cover these diagnostics unless they are proved to be both effective–accurately spotting whether a person will respond to a drug, for example–and cost-effective. Insurers would be motivated to pay for tests that could rule out an expensive cancer treatment as unlikely to work. But with drugs that are inexpensive in the first place, the financial case for such testing is less obvious.

If scientists succeed in developing tests that can accurately predict an individual’s risk of disease years or decades in advance of symptoms, the problem of who pays will become even trickier–especially in the United States, where people change insurance plans every three to four years on average. Pharmacy benefits managers such as Medco and CVS Caremark, which provide prescription-drug coverage to many Americans on behalf of employers and insurers, are starting to take the lead in judging the economic value of personalized medicine (see “Sequencing Companies Dominate Investment”).

chromosome map

To explore how specific parts of the genome have been linked to different diseases, click on one of the diseases above. The map will point to spots on certain chromosomes that raise the risk of that disease. This map includes only a handful of the disease-linked genes that have been uncovered to date. For a more complete listing, visit the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information morbidity map.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

computation concept
computation concept

How AI is reinventing what computers are

Three key ways artificial intelligence is changing what it means to compute.

still from Embodied Intelligence video
still from Embodied Intelligence video

These weird virtual creatures evolve their bodies to solve problems

They show how intelligence and body plans are closely linked—and could unlock AI for robots.

seeing is believing concept
seeing is believing concept

Our brains exist in a state of “controlled hallucination”

Three new books lay bare the weirdness of how our brains process the world around us.

We reviewed three at-home covid tests. The results were mixed.

Over-the-counter coronavirus tests are finally available in the US. Some are more accurate and easier to use than others.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.