Skip to Content

Major Automakers Spurred by California Standards

Rather than bemoaning California’s tougher fuel standards, Honda and Chrysler executives embrace change.
January 21, 2009

Major automakers such as Honda and Chrysler are realizing that it’s time to throw away the old game plan and chart a new one around the sale of smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Ironically, some of the most direct evidence of this changed thinking lies buried at the end of an otherwise apologistic report on the U.S. auto industry’s troubles in the L.A. Times earlier this week.

The L.A. Times story reports on a likely forthcoming waiver from President Obama’s EPA effectively allowing states to demand better fuel economy than the federal CAFE standard. After declaring this a “nightmare scenario for automakers,” the article delivers desperate quotes from General Motors and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers–the trade group that fought (unsuccessfully) to block California’s standards in court. A GM spokesperson sets the tone, saying that subjecting a depressed industry to these tough standards is like asking a cancer patient to “finish chemo and then go run the Boston Marathon.”

Here’s an alternative bedside analogy that looks to a deeper cancer: setting lower standards than the European Union and China are already phasing in is reminiscent of the fatalistic approach to cancer treatment in which doctors hid from their patients the full extent of their sickness. If a carcinoma eats the auto industry from within, it is surely its own denial of the imperative need to provide radically cleaner transportation solutions–a subspecies of what President Obama on Tuesday called “our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age.”

Which brings us to the L.A. Times article’s buried gem, in which Ed Cohen, Honda’s vice president for government affairs, makes the most of the last word. Cohen reports that Honda has been expecting Obama to unleash California’s regulators and is laying plans for “a fleet far more efficient than even that called for under the California rules”:

“We’re setting a pattern for the future,” Cohen said. “Any company that is not assuming a constant rate of improvement in fuel economy and carbon emissions is making a big mistake.”

Detroit’s engineers may, too, be preparing real change, rather than counting on their lobbyists and Washington gridlock. Consider what one Chrysler executive told the online electric-vehicle-oriented publication EV World at last week’s Detroit auto show. Bill Moore, EV World’s editor, writes in his “EV World Insider” column this week that the unnamed executive credited the impending California standards as a key driver of Chrysler’s recent EV epiphanies. (There’s no link to those quotes just yet, as Moore’s column is premium content; nonsubscribers can read here in about a month or, of course, subscribe.)

Peter Fairley, an independent journalist and editor of the Web journal Carbon-Nation, tracks energy innovation around the globe, from the solar-powered villages of Bolivia’s Cordillera to China’s mechanizing coalfields.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.