Skip to Content

Catching a Pathogen

A new process identifies mystery microbes.
April 22, 2008

When a particularly deadly pathogen appears, any delay in identifying it can slow the development of treatments and diagnostic tests. But until recently, identifying a pathogen usually required some advance knowledge of its genetic makeup. Now a team led by W. Ian ­Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at ­Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health, has shown how to use advanced gene-sequencing tech­nology to identify even the most mysterious pathogen. Lipkin starts by partly isolating a pathogen’s genetic material from that of its human host. Then he sequences the ­sample using technology developed by 454 Life Sciences of Branford, CT; unlike other systems, 454’s doesn’t require prior information about the sequence you are looking for. Finally, ­Lipkin searches a database to see if any known sequences match the ones he’s identified.

The team’s first feat: identifying the virus that killed three Australian transplant patients who had received organs from a single donor. Lipkin has since used the technique to identify more than 20 viruses.

1. To identify an unknown pathogen, researchers begin by extracting a tissue sample from an infected patient.

2. An enzyme is used to remove all traces of human and microbial DNA, leaving a mix of human and microbial RNA sequences. This step can increase the technique’s sensitivity to viruses.

3. DNA sequences that correspond to these RNA sequences are copied millions of times. Then they’re read using technology from 454 Life Sciences.

4. The sequencing done, computational techniques developed at Columbia University weed out human sequences and assemble the remaining microbial sequences to create the “fingerprint” of the mystery microbe.

5. Bioinformatics software compares the microbial fingerprint against databases of known microbial sequences, searching for close matches. Once the variant is fully characterized, diagnostic tools can be developed to detect the microbe in future patients.

Credit: Tami Tolpa

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build

“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”

ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it

The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.

Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives

The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.

Learning to code isn’t enough

Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.