Skip to Content

Selling Stem Cells

BioTime’s Michael West wants to standardize and commercialize stem cells for scientists.
April 9, 2008

A California biotech company headed by Michael West, a prominent scientist and entrepreneur involved in stem cell research, plans to supply scientists working with stem cells the tool they most need to develop and test novel therapies–a reliable and reproducible source of the cells.

Systematic cells: Michael West, CEO of BioTime, has developed new cell lines he hopes to market to stem cell researchers.

Stem cells hold great promise for medicine, both as a potential source of replacement cells for damaged organs and as a scientific resource to study disease and develop and test new drugs. But to realize that promise, scientists have to figure out how to make their products on an industrial scale. “It’s clear we’ll need a much better strategy for reliably and reproducibly generating large numbers of specific cell types,” says Arnold R. Kriegstein, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. “Most studies until now have stopped short of doing this.”

The very qualities that make stem cells so desirable–the ability to self-replicate and develop into many types of cells–can also make them difficult to control. For example, two cell lines produced the same way but from different starting materials don’t always behave the same, a property that’s essential for both cell-based therapies and scientific studies.

West, CEO of BioTime and its subsidiary, Embryome Sciences, plans to sell lines of cells that he dubs “human embryonic progenitors”–cells that have inched partway along the continuum from embryonic stem cell to differentiated adult cell. West and collaborators published a paper last week describing their efforts to generate cells that reproduce only the same type of cells, theoretically creating a better-defined cell product.

In the early 1990s, West cofounded Geron, a biotech company based in Menlo Park, CA, that was originally focused on developing treatments for age-related diseases and is now developing embryonic stem cell-based therapies for spinal cord injury and other diseases. (Geron supported early research at the University of Wisconsin, where human embryonic stem cells were first isolated, and licensed crucial patents from the university.) Prior to joining BioTime, West headed Advanced Cell Technologies, a Los Angeles-based company that is also developing embryonic stem cell-based therapies, as well as new ways to generate embryonic stem cells.

West’s latest career move–to head a company developing tools for the field rather than the therapies themselves–reflects in part a maturation of stem-cell medicine as a whole. Greater numbers of scientists are moving into this area of research, and their expertise may lie in neurology or cardiology, rather than in stem cell biology. “It’s an interesting business model,” says Evan Snyder, director of the Stem Cell Research Center at the Burnham Institute in La Jolla, CA. “I could clearly see a customer base in scientists who simply see stem cells as a way of providing lots of cells for their use.” For example, scientists who want to screen new drugs for Parkinson’s disease would ideally like to have a large number of dopamine neurons, the cell type affected in the disease.

Currently, scientists prod stem cells to develop into specific cell types by exposing them to some of the same chemicals those cells would encounter during normal development. However, the process is often inefficient, yielding a small number of the desired cells that must then be purified from other cell types.

In the paper published last week in the journal Regenerative Medicine, West and colleagues grew embryonic stem cells under different conditions and then isolated lines of stem cells that appeared to reproduce only clones. (Embryonic stem cells, on the other hand, develop into conglomerations of nerves and other tissue when left to their own devices.) Researchers characterized the molecular markers on the different cells, identifying more than 140 unique lines. “[The] approach is very unusual,” says Jeanne Loring, director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine at The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla. “I don’t think there is anyone else doing anything like this.”

BioTime is already gearing up commercial manufacturing, aiming to begin shipping cells in six to 12 months. However, much work remains to be done in terms of characterizing the cells’ properties. It’s not yet clear how closely these cells resemble progenitor cells found in the body during normal stages of development. And follow-up studies need to be done to determine their full differentiation potential–the type of adult cell that each cell line can develop into. It’s also not yet clear if these cells can be reliably reproduced, a crucial property for potential customers.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Sam Altman says helpful agents are poised to become AI’s killer function

Open AI’s CEO says we won’t need new hardware or lots more training data to get there.

A brief, weird history of brainwashing

L. Ron Hubbard, Operation Midnight Climax, and stochastic terrorism—the race for mind control changed America forever.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.