Skip to Content

Cells by Design

What synthetic biology most needs is a better way to synthesize DNA.

Living cells are amazing things. They created the oxygen we breathe and the fossil fuels that power our world. They provided the organic compounds that form the basis of many drugs and materials. They feed us, live in our bodies, and protect us from other cells and viruses. They can self-organize. They can learn.

It’s clear, then, that the potential range of what biological systems could do is enormous. Among the areas that could most obviously benefit from them are health care, chemical and materials production, environmental remediation, and energy. However, most of the systems that would be useful in these areas are unlikely to occur naturally. We probably won’t stumble upon a cell capable of serving as an artificial blood substitute, for example, or one that harnesses sunlight as transportation fuel. These systems must be engineered.

Synthetic biology seeks to build non-natural systems by adding DNA sequences–effectively, little genetic “programs”–to well-studied cells such as E. coli and yeast. This is, at heart, an engineering problem, one that requires both new “software” (new sequences of DNA) and new hardware (the DNA itself–and the methods for putting it into cells). Synthetic biology has thus far dealt principally with the software. But making the DNA that can be put into cells is difficult and expensive; it has been the fundamental impediment to progress.

Today, long sequences of DNA can be synthesized chemically by commercial vendors at a cost of $1 per base (the DNA “letters” A, T, C, and G). Considering that the sequences we design today are on the order of 10,000 bases, and we want to redesign entire four-megabase genomes, the costs quickly become astronomical. We hope the price will drop, but an alternative lies in the automated assembly of standard biological parts. Here, we don’t synthesize each DNA program with base-level precision. We instead begin with a library of “basic part” DNA sequences. A robot joins these sequences into complete genetic programs using a standard assembly reaction. It is analogous to building electronic devices from a box of transistors, capacitors, and resistors rather than building the whole system at once by lithographic methods. The key is making the technique robust, low cost, and highly automated.

Synthetic biology will really take off once it has transformed itself into an information-driven discipline. The key to that transformation is automated synthesis. The potential is clear–we have no shortage of naturally evolved examples that tell us where the technology can go. We just have to figure out how to take it there.

J. Christopher Anderson, a member of the 2007 TR35, is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of California, Berkeley.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Rendering of Waterfront Toronto project
Rendering of Waterfront Toronto project

Toronto wants to kill the smart city forever

The city wants to get right what Sidewalk Labs got so wrong.

Muhammad bin Salman funds anti-aging research
Muhammad bin Salman funds anti-aging research

Saudi Arabia plans to spend $1 billion a year discovering treatments to slow aging

The oil kingdom fears that its population is aging at an accelerated rate and hopes to test drugs to reverse the problem. First up might be the diabetes drug metformin.

Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun

Yann LeCun has a bold new vision for the future of AI

One of the godfathers of deep learning pulls together old ideas to sketch out a fresh path for AI, but raises as many questions as he answers.

images created by Google Imagen
images created by Google Imagen

The dark secret behind those cute AI-generated animal images

Google Brain has revealed its own image-making AI, called Imagen. But don't expect to see anything that isn't wholesome.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.