Skip to Content

Ritalin helps people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder concentrate. But it stimulates the entire brain, causing side effects such as insomnia.

Graduate student Timothy Buschman (left) and Professor Earl Miller study attention.

Earl K. Miller, associate director of the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and Timothy Buschman, a grad student in brain and cognitive sciences, hope that a better understanding of how attention works could lead to drugs targeting the brain regions where ADHD symptoms arise. They recently described their work, which suggests that two different brain regions control two different kinds of attention, in Science.

Miller and Buschman monitored electrical activity in the parietal and frontal cortices of monkeys performing visual tasks designed to elicit the two kinds of attention: automatic and willful. Monkeys watching a screen searched for a green rectangle. To test for automatic attention, the researchers put the green rectangle in a field of red rectangles, to make it pop out at the monkeys quickly. In images testing for willful attention, the green rectangle had to be distinguished more carefully from an array of multicolored rectangles.

Their results suggest that the frontal cortex is responsible for willful attention and the parietal cortex for automatic. Other researchers had looked at the cortices separately and found that both seemed to be involved with attention. The Picower researchers were the first to monitor both concurrently and to distinguish their roles in the two kinds of attention. They plan to test their findings in healthy people and those with ADHD.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language

For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.

Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death

Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.