Skip to Content

Atomic Design of Superstrong Materials

A new computer model could significantly advance nanoscale engineering.
March 12, 2007

Researchers have learned how to design the nanoscale features of materials to make them four times stronger without making them brittle. The new insight is the result of a significant improvement to an existing computer model that allowed researchers to, for the first time, simulate the complex mechanical behavior of nanostructures in metals.


The work, described in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by researchers at MIT, OhioState, and the Georgia Institute of Technology, could lead to more-durable materials for gears in microscale machines. It could also lead to coatings that dramatically improve the performance of larger-scale structures, such as metal plating on artificial joints, says Subra Suresh, professor of materials science and engineering at MIT.

The advance is part of a larger ongoing effort to use software to discover new materials that would be impossible or impractical to discover using experiments alone. Computers make it possible to fine-tune and quickly compare various material parameters, such as the ratios and locations of the elements used and their crystal structures. Such techniques have already suggested new combinations of elements for high-performance battery electrodes, for example.

Simulations of the electrical and optical properties, however, have been more successful than models of materials’ mechanical behavior. That’s because the computations are so involved that even the fastest supercomputers can only simulate the stretching, compressing, and cracking of materials for very short time periods–on the order of a billionth of a second. That’s not nearly long enough to test the models against measurements gathered in real-world experiments, which take place over several seconds, minutes, or even hours.

The MIT researchers based their new model, which can work on these longer time scales, on one invented in 2000 in which the occurrence of rare events is used to extrapolate from short time scales to seconds or minutes. All that’s needed is a good idea of how often these events take place, as well as how long they take. The method, however, would not work when, as is the case with some nanostructured materials, the “landscape is very complicated,” says Efthimios Kaxiras, professor of physics and applied physics at Harvard.

To overcome this problem, the researchers modified the method so that it can be used to model materials in which the duration of these rare events isn’t known, or in which the events take place over long time scales. “It’s a nice modification that gives you additional freedom if you don’t know exactly where you’re going to end up,” Kaxiras says.

“It gives us the ability to link nanoscale features to the mechanical properties of materials,” Suresh says.

The researchers used the model to understand for the first time the way that nanostructures in copper can make the material three to four times stronger without the usual trade-off of making the material more brittle. What they found could help them optimize the properties of copper, Suresh says.

The answer lies in the way that copper atoms interact with interfaces between and within the microscopic crystals that make up copper. Within each of these crystals, called grains, atoms are free to slide past one another in certain directions but not others when a force is applied to the material. But when the atoms reach the edge of a grain, they meet atoms in the neighboring grain that aren’t free to move in that same direction. As a result, the atoms stop slipping. For decades, researchers have known that making the grains smaller–say, 10 nanometers across instead of a few micrometers–makes the material stronger. That’s because there are more grains and, therefore, more boundaries that prevent the atoms from shifting.

If too much force is applied, however, the dislocated atoms at these boundaries can cause the materials to break apart. This makes nanostructured materials more brittle.

The new version of copper contains another set of boundaries, called twins. These occur inside a grain when atoms on either side of an imaginary line are mirror images of each other. In the new copper, the grains are much larger than 10 nanometers, but they’re divided into twins with boundaries about 10 nanometers apart. These boundaries are much more orderly than grain boundaries are.

The researchers found that the twins resist the movement of the atoms, making the material stronger. But even if the force is too great for the twin boundary to stop the atoms from moving, the material doesn’t break apart because the atoms are lined up in an orderly way. Rather, the displaced atoms are absorbed on the other side of the boundary.

Although the model has only been tested against data about nanostructured copper, Suresh says it can be applied to other metals as well, making it a general tool that could advance nanodesign in many areas.

Kaxiras says the new model is a significant improvement and that this first application is “quite interesting.” He adds that “the results are very insightful.”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

DeepMind’s cofounder: Generative AI is just a phase. What’s next is interactive AI.

“This is a profound moment in the history of technology,” says Mustafa Suleyman.

What to know about this autumn’s covid vaccines

New variants will pose a challenge, but early signs suggest the shots will still boost antibody responses.

Human-plus-AI solutions mitigate security threats

With the right human oversight, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence can help keep business and customer data secure

Next slide, please: A brief history of the corporate presentation

From million-dollar slide shows to Steve Jobs’s introduction of the iPhone, a bit of show business never hurt plain old business.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.