Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Ernst Mayr on Aliens

Ernst Mayr, the greatest evolutionary theorist of the 20th century, died last February at the age of 100. Andrew Madden, our obituaries editor (yes, we have one) wrote a very nice tribute to his life and work in the July…
June 27, 2005

Ernst Mayr, the greatest evolutionary theorist of the 20th century, died last February at the age of 100. Andrew Madden, our obituaries editor (yes, we have one) wrote a very nice tribute to his life and work in the July issue of Technology Review.

Mayr was an extraordinarily prolific and influential figure, developing not one but two distinct biological theories. The first was the modern evolutionary synthesis of Darwinism and Mendelian genetics: the synthesis forms the basis of today’s orthodox definition of species. Mayr’s second theory, developed when he had already retired from active teaching at Harvard, was of peripatric speciation, which purports to explain how new species evolve through geographical isolation. This last idea is still controversial because it does not seem applicable to all species - for instance, recent mathematical models suggest that insects can evolve into distinct species by a weird process called sympatric speciation.

Mayr was also very interested in the philosophy of biology, arguing consistently against “reductionism” - that is, the view that evolution acts only on genes rather than upon the entire organism.

This weekend, I was reading through Philosophy of Biology, edited by Michael Ruse, when I came across a strange little essay by Mayr on aliens. I had no idea he was interested in the subject. In “The Probability of Extraterrestrial Life” (originally written in 1985 for another collection titled Extraterrestrials: Science and Alien Intelligence) Mayr took a very similar line to the one I proposed in a recent post.

Most of the essay is a densely structured argument on how wildly improbable life is at all - and, by extenstion, how even more unlikely is intelligence. But at the conclusion of the essay, Mayr is admirably clear:

“Even if there were intelligent extraterrestrial life, and even if it had developed a highly sophisticated technology, the timing of their efforts and those of our engineers would have to overlap to an altogether improbable degree, considering the amounts of astronomical time available. Every aspect of “extraterrestrial intelligence” that we consider confronts us with astronomically low probabilities. If one multiplies them together, one comes out so close to zero, that it is zero for all extents and purposes.”

Exactly what I said.

Technorati tags: Fermi, SETI, extraterrestrials

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Europe's AI Act concept
Europe's AI Act concept

A quick guide to the most important AI law you’ve never heard of

The European Union is planning new legislation aimed at curbing the worst harms associated with artificial intelligence.

Uber Autonomous Vehicles parked in a lot
Uber Autonomous Vehicles parked in a lot

It will soon be easy for self-driving cars to hide in plain sight. We shouldn’t let them.

If they ever hit our roads for real, other drivers need to know exactly what they are.

supermassive black hole at center of Milky Way
supermassive black hole at center of Milky Way

This is the first image of the black hole at the center of our galaxy

The stunning image was made possible by linking eight existing radio observatories across the globe.

transplant surgery
transplant surgery

The gene-edited pig heart given to a dying patient was infected with a pig virus

The first transplant of a genetically-modified pig heart into a human may have ended prematurely because of a well-known—and avoidable—risk.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.