Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Scientific Revisionism

The scientific revisionism coming out of the Bush Administration over global warming is shocking and astonishing to me. As the New York Times reported on Saturday, and The Observer followed up on Sunday (and the Washington Post began last Friday),…
June 20, 2005

The scientific revisionism coming out of the Bush Administration over global warming is shocking and astonishing to me. As the New York Times reported on Saturday, and The Observer followed up on Sunday (and the Washington Post began last Friday), the White House has succeeded in altering the statement due to come out of the G8 summit in Scotland next month. Among other alterations is the simple statement “Our world is warming.” There are few scientific facts in the global warming debate that are as widely established as this–even staunch skeptics stopped arguing this point about a decade ago. Simple thermometer readings show it, like these from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. The melting of glaciers, the shifting of species, the simplest of climate models–all provide evidence. The warming of the Earth is beyond dispute. That this administration would insist on its deletion is an example of how desperate and untenable and craven their position has become.

If Blair and the rest of the G8 let the Bush Administration get away with this–and the summit at Gleneagles isn’t until July 6-8–merely for the sake of a commonly agreed-upon summit document…then I think the era of G8 significance will have come to a close.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language

For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.

Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death

Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.