Skip to Content
Uncategorized

IPCC Dissension

A prominent member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has resigned after accusing a lead author of injecting his personal opinions into the science of global warming and hurricanes. The delightfully named Chris Landsea submitted his resignation from…
January 21, 2005

A prominent member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has resigned after accusing a lead author of injecting his personal opinions into the science of global warming and hurricanes.

The delightfully named Chris Landsea submitted his resignation from the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report; Reuters reports here. You can read Landsea’s open letter about his resignation here; the essential question is whether global warming is contributing to an increase in hurricane frequency and intensity. The IPCC’s Third Assessment Report, published in 2001, reported no essential increase in tropical cyclones.

Though it’s difficult to give justice to this complicated subject in a blog entry, Tom Knutson of NOAA has done work suggesting that, while it’s difficult to tell if hurricane numbers will be greater or fewer in the future, “the hurricanes that do occur near the end of the 21st century are expected to be stronger and have significantly more intense rainfall than under present day climate conditions.”

That’s consistent with what Kevin Trenberth of NCAR, against whom Landsea’s objections are directed, told the radio show Living on Earth in September – though, to be fair, Landsea’s differences appear to come from the transcript of a Harvard press conference that had come to the conclusion that global warming was impacting hurricane activity today.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI

The tool, called Nightshade, messes up training data in ways that could cause serious damage to image-generating AI models. 

Rogue superintelligence and merging with machines: Inside the mind of OpenAI’s chief scientist

An exclusive conversation with Ilya Sutskever on his fears for the future of AI and why they’ve made him change the focus of his life’s work.

The Biggest Questions: What is death?

New neuroscience is challenging our understanding of the dying process—bringing opportunities for the living.

Driving companywide efficiencies with AI

Advanced AI and ML capabilities revolutionize how administrative and operations tasks are done.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.