Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Realclimate vs. Crichton

Michael Crichton, a mere science fiction novelist, has written State of Fear, a supposed countermeasure to what he sees as the scare tactics of environmentalists concerned about global warming. The climatologists at Realclimate have been taking on Crichton’s false and…
December 27, 2004

Michael Crichton, a mere science fiction novelist, has written State of Fear, a supposed countermeasure to what he sees as the scare tactics of environmentalists concerned about global warming. The climatologists at Realclimate have been taking on Crichton’s false and misleading claims, and with them his sycophant George Will.

Crichton’s conclusion is that global warming is not a problem. Gavin Schmidt at Realclimate takes him on first, deflating Crichton’s claims about the cooling period between 1940 and 1970, his claim that selected cool spots negate global warming (which is concerned with globally defined averages), his mischaracterization of the particulars of sea-level rise, and other scientific points. The upshot of Schmidt’s argument is that in several important ways Crichton has either misrepresented the science or failed to appreciate its nuances, and that the science, done properly, is well-represented by the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report published in 2001. Michael Mann has more to say about Crichton here.

Along comes George Will, who is not a scientist either, to opine on Crichton in particular and global warming in general. Surprise, surprise, but Will also fails to understand important scientific points and mischaracterizes the situation; Realclimate responds here and here.

Why the world is willing to pay attention to what novelists and political pundits think about the complex science behind global climate change is a subject for another day.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

ChatGPT is about to revolutionize the economy. We need to decide what that looks like.

New large language models will transform many jobs. Whether they will lead to widespread prosperity or not is up to us.

Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death

Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.

GPT-4 is bigger and better than ChatGPT—but OpenAI won’t say why

We got a first look at the much-anticipated big new language model from OpenAI. But this time how it works is even more deeply under wraps.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.