Skip to Content

Cheaper Sucker

Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, CA, believe they can save the country more than $1.5 billion a year in electricity by updating the 60-year-old-design of a laboratory staple: the fume hood. There are close to a million fume hoods in the United States, protecting high-school chemistry students and industry researchers alike by sucking up airborne chemicals, microbes, and particles. But hoods also suck up a lot of power: a typical one uses more energy each year than three homes. The key to the efficiency of the Berkeley Lab’s design is small fans at the top and bottom of the hood opening that create a curtain of clean air between the worker and hazardous substances on the countertop. Behind that curtain, a more powerful fan draws out the contaminated air, in much the way a conventional hood’s does. But because the fumes are already contained, the new system requires only about a third of the airflow and therefore much less energy. Berkeley Lab researchers and fume hood manufacturers are now field-testing the hoods in operating laboratories.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Here’s how a Twitter engineer says it will break in the coming weeks

One insider says the company’s current staffing isn’t able to sustain the platform.

Technology that lets us “speak” to our dead relatives has arrived. Are we ready?

Digital clones of the people we love could forever change how we grieve.

How to befriend a crow

I watched a bunch of crows on TikTok and now I'm trying to connect with some local birds.

Starlink signals can be reverse-engineered to work like GPS—whether SpaceX likes it or not

Elon said no thanks to using his mega-constellation for navigation. Researchers went ahead anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.