A Nanodrop in the Bucket
The Environmental Protection Agency has decided to spend a measly $4 million studying the health and environmental risks posed by manufactured nanoparticles–only 0.1 percent of the $3.7 billion the federal government has committed to the technology over the next four years. It’s almost as if they’re afraid what they might find out. An EPA official calls it “infinitely morethan has ever been done before,” and theoretically she’s right–because none has been done before, despite the advances that have already taken place in the field. Activist groups like Environmental Defense and the ETC Group are calling for funding more like $100 million–more appropriate for a field that’s growing fast and is predicted to change the future, and one for which deleterious effects have already been found in fish. You can’t find what you don’t go looking for, and this is too little, too late.
Keep Reading
Most Popular
Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.
And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.
OpenAI teases an amazing new generative video model called Sora
The firm is sharing Sora with a small group of safety testers but the rest of us will have to wait to learn more.
Google’s Gemini is now in everything. Here’s how you can try it out.
Gmail, Docs, and more will now come with Gemini baked in. But Europeans will have to wait before they can download the app.
This baby with a head camera helped teach an AI how kids learn language
A neural network trained on the experiences of a single young child managed to learn one of the core components of language: how to match words to the objects they represent.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.