The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Grokster and StreamCast Networks are not legally responsible for users who swap copyrighted content through their file-sharing software.
The unanimous three-judge panel upheld a lower court ruling that dismissed the bulk of the lawsuit brought by movie studios and record labels. The decision is pretty serious blow to the legal tactics movie studios and record labels have been using to battle piracy. Coverage by the AP and Reuters is available at CBSNew.com and CNN/Money.
The court rightly noted that the software firms were simply providing software that allows users to share information over the Internet, regardless of whether that shared information was copyrighted.
“The technology has numerous other uses, significantly reducing the distribution costs of public domain and permissively shared art and speech, as well as reducing the centralized control of that distribution,” Judge Sidney R. Thomas noted in the court’s written decision.
This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
The tool, called Nightshade, messes up training data in ways that could cause serious damage to image-generating AI models.
Rogue superintelligence and merging with machines: Inside the mind of OpenAI’s chief scientist
An exclusive conversation with Ilya Sutskever on his fears for the future of AI and why they’ve made him change the focus of his life’s work.
Data analytics reveal real business value
Sophisticated analytics tools mine insights from data, optimizing operational processes across the enterprise.
Driving companywide efficiencies with AI
Advanced AI and ML capabilities revolutionize how administrative and operations tasks are done.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.