Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Google IPO Gets Exclusive

Billed as a means for the average investor to get in on the ground floor of the hottest company to go public in years, Google’s auction-style IPO has nonetheless ended up with elitist overtones. “The underwriters’ definition of ‘average investor’…
August 12, 2004

Billed as a means for the average investor to get in on the ground floor of the hottest company to go public in years, Google’s auction-style IPO has nonetheless ended up with elitist overtones. “The underwriters’ definition of ‘average investor’ for this IPO apparently includes above-average knowledge, experience, and money,” writes AP business writer Michael J. Martinez, whose brokerage firm disqualified him from participating.

Martinez’s story is an interesting inside peek at the new process. He describes his experience filling out a required eligibility questionnaire before Ameritrade would permit him to enter the auction. To satisfy SEC requirements, each individual underwriter must determine a bidder’s eligibility to participate in the Google IPO–and each brokerage can set its own requirements. To avoid more lawsuits from disgruntled investors, the firms are being pretty strict this time around, it seems.

Google’s process, involving public bidding, a minimum purchase of only five shares, and 28 separate underwriters, was designed to open the IPO to a new level of public participation. But as Martinez points out, stock, and especially risky IPOs, aren’t for everyone.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build

“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”

ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it

The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.

Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives

The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.

Learning to code isn’t enough

Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.